Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24196789›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013

Mutation landscape in melanoma patients clinical implications of heterogeneity of BRAF mutations.

L Heinzerling, M Baiter, S Kühnapfel, G Schuler, P Keikavoussi, A Agaimy, F Kiesewetter, A Hartmann, R Schneider-Stock

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparison of Two Rapid Assays for the Detection ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Annals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2021
    Article
  11. BRAF Heterogeneity in Melanoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Biology to Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cancers · 2019
    Article
  19. Detection of driver mutations in BRAF can aid in diagnosis and early treatment of dedifferentiated metastatic melanoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L HeinzerlingDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
M Baiter
S Kühnapfel
G Schuler
P Keikavoussi
A Agaimy
F Kiesewetter
A Hartmann
R Schneider-Stock
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe detection of V600E BRAF mutations has fundamental clinical consequences as the treatment option with BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib or dabrafenib yields response rates of ~48%. Heterogeneity with respect to BRAF mutation in different metastases has been described in single cases. As this has important implications for the determination of BRAF status and treatment of patients, it is essential to acquire more data.

methodsA total of 300 tumour samples from 187 melanoma patients were analysed for BRAF mutations by pyrosequencing. Equivocal results were confirmed by capillary sequencing. Clinical data with respect to melanoma type, tumour site and survival were summarised for 53 patients with multiple analysed tumour samples (2-13 per patient).

resultsBRAF mutations were found in 84 patients (44.9%) and 144 tumour samples (48%) with BRAF mutations in 45.5% of primary tumours and 51.3% of metastases, respectively. In 10 out of 53 patients (18.9%) where multiple samples were analysed results were discordant with respect to mutation findings with wild-type and mutated tumours in the same patient. Mutations did not appear more frequently over the course of disease nor was its occurrence associated with a specific localisation of metastases.

conclusionAs heterogeneity with respect to BRAF mutation status is detected in melanoma patients, subsequent testing of initially wild-type patients can yield different results and thus make BRAF inhibitor therapy accessible. The role of heterogeneity in testing and for clinical response to therapy with a BRAF inhibitor needs to be further investigated.

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityMutation, MissenseAmino Acid SubstitutionDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGene FrequencyHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSkin NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID24196789
PMCPMC3844905
OpenAlexW2087323113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.