ArticleDer Pathologe2013
[Update pulmonary pathology : Report of the Pulmonary Pathology Working Group of the German Society of Pathology].
Article in Der Pathologe, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Report of the working group on thoracic pathology of the German Society of Pathology 2018].Der Pathologe · 2018Article
- [Report of the Working Group on Thoracic Pathology of the German Society of Pathology 2017].Der Pathologe · 2017Article
- [Report of the working group Thoracic Pathology of the German Pathological Society 2016].Der Pathologe · 2016Article
- [Not Available].Der Pathologe · 2015Article
- [Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors in the new WHO 2015 classification: Start of breaking new grounds?].Der Pathologe · 2015Review
- [Neuroendocrine tumors of the lungs. From small cell lung carcinoma to diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia].Der Pathologe · 2014Review
- [Report of the working group on pneumopathology 2014: current developments in pulmonary pathology].Der Pathologe · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Pulmonary Pathology Working Group of the German Society of Pathology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pathologie DGP) can look back on an eventful year. Apart from the autumn meeting in Bremen in November 2012 and the sessions at the annual DGP congress in Heidelberg in May 2013, several articles dealing with the classification of pulmonary carcinoids as well as predictive analyses of cytological specimens and small biopsies of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could be published with support and co-authorship of a large number of members of the working group. In this report, the key aspects of the last year's activities of the working group are summarized, including molecular diagnosis of lung tumors, NSCLC classification, neuroendocrine tumors, TNM and R classification, interstitial lung diseases, pneumoconioses, and pleural mesothelioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24196640What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.