ArticleSurgical endoscopy2014
Usefulness of the introducer method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy using ultrathin transnasal endoscopy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe introducer method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) minimizes procedure-related peristomal infection. Ultrathin transnasal endoscopy (UTE) allows comfortable endoscopic examination of patients with fewer adverse effects and passage of the endoscope through a narrow esophagus or oropharynx. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes for the introducer method of PEG with UTE.
methodsPatients who underwent the introducer method of PEG with UTE between March 2009 and May 2012 were analyzed. The outcomes and complications of the patients within 180 days after gastrostomy placement were investigated.
resultDuring the study period, 92 patients (31.9 % male; age, 67.7 ± 16.6 years) underwent the introducer method of PEG with UTE. The major indications for PEG insertion were stroke (40.4 %), esophageal cancer or head and neck cancer (27.1 %), and neurologic disorder (14.9 %). Esophageal stenosis was identified by endoscopy or imaging in 14 patients before PEG. In all the patients, UTE was successfully introduced through the nasal cavity. In 90 (97.8 %) of the 92 patients, PEG was successfully inserted. Insertion of the endoscope into the stomach was impossible in two patients because head and neck cancer caused severe narrowing of the upper esophagus. No procedure-related peristomal infection, gastric contents leakage, or bleeding occurred within 30 days after gastrostomy placement. In eight patients (8.7 %), catheter displacement occurred within 30 days. Catheter displacement in 44 patients (47.8 %) and gastric contents leakage in eight patients (9 %) occurred within 30-180 days after gastrostomy placement.
conclusionIntroducer PEG with UTE is a useful method for gastrostomy placement with a high success rate. This technique allows procedure-related complications to be avoided and permits the use of endoscopy in patients with narrow esophagi or oropharynges. However, the long-term durability of the balloon-type catheter is questionable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.