ArticleDer Anaesthesist2013
[Reliability of emergency medical field triage : Exemplified by traffic accident victims].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality measurement in physician-staffed emergency medical services: a systematic literature review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2019Pooled it
- Accuracy between prehospital and hospital diagnosis in helicopter emergency medical services and its consequences for trauma care.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- Epidemiology and predictors of traumatic spine injury in severely injured patients: implications for emergency procedures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrauma is the leading cause of death in the patient group under 40 years of age. Within the prehospital management of seriously injured trauma victims the accuracy of the field triage by emergency physicians is of utmost importance.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of prehospital emergency physician field triage in road traffic accident victims. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study involved a retrospective analysis and comparison of prehospital and inhospital trauma records of road traffic accident victims treated by a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) team and transferred to a level I trauma centre. A comparison of prehospital and inhospital diagnostic findings was carried out according to an anatomical score (AIS).
resultsIncluded in the analysis were 479 patients with a mean age of 37.0 ± 18.2 years, males 65.8 %, mean injury severity score (ISS) 15.5 ± 13.5, ISS > 16 in 41,1 % and mortality 7.3 %. The leading causes of injury were motor vehicle accidents (56.2 %), followed by motorcycle (24.0 %) and bicycle accidents (11.6 %) as well as truck accidents (4.0 %) and pedestrian accidents (4.2 %). The most common body regions injured (AIS ≥ 3) were the chest (37 %), head (25.1 %) and lower extremities (16.7 %). A correct prehospital field triage by emergency physicians was found for injuries with an AIS ≥ 3 of the head 77 %, chest 69 %, abdomen 51 %, pelvis 49 %, extremities 70 %, neck/cervical spine 67 % and thoracic/lumbar spine 70 %. Overlooked injuries in the prehospital setting (AIS ≥ 3) comprised predominantly injuries of the trunk (chest 12.6 %, abdomen 16.9 % and pelvis 15 %). Overlooked injuries were found significantly less for the head in patients with a Glasgow Coma Score ≤ 8 on arrival at the scene (5.4 % versus 19 %, p = 0.015), for the chest in patients with a S(p)O(2) ≤ 96 % on arrival at the scene (18.1 % versus 35.5 %, p = 0.004) and for the abdomen in patients with a systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg on arrival at the scene (28.6 % versus 52.5 %, p = 0.025).
conclusionAccurate field triage in seriously injured road accident victims, even by trained physicians, is difficult. This pertains especially to injuries to the abdomen and the pelvis. For the field triage a combination of anatomical and physiological criteria as well as the mechanism of injury should be used to increase accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.