Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24195916›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Spinal cord stimulation for predominant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (PROMISE study).

Philippe Rigoard, Mehul J Desai, Richard B North, Rod S Taylor, Lieven Annemans, Christine Greening, Ye Tan, Carine Van den Abeele, Jane Shipley, Krishna Kumar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01697358 (Prospective, Randomized Study of Multicolumn Implantable Lead Stimulation for Predominant Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01697358 phase4completednot on this map

Prospective, Randomized Study of Multicolumn Implantable Lead Stimulation for Predominant Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedtronicNeuroRan2013 to 2017Enrolled278ConditionsFailed Back Surgery Syndrome, Back Pain, Pain in Leg, UnspecifiedArmsSpinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), Optimal Medical Management (OMM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Spinal cord stimulation for low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  7. The appropriate management of persisting pain after spine surgery: a European panel study with recommendations based on the RAND/UCLA method.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Article
  8. Use Stereoscopic Model in Interventional and Surgical Procedures.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Article
  9. Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Spinal stimulation for pain: future applications.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Philippe Rigoard
Mehul J Desai
Richard B North
Rod S TaylorInstitute of Health Research, Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Veysey Building, Salmon Pool Lane, Exeter EX2 4SG, UK. rod.taylor@pms.ac.uk.
Lieven Annemans
Christine Greening
Ye Tan
Carine Van den Abeele
Jane Shipley
Krishna Kumar
Dent Neurologic Institute · USMedtronic (United States) · USGhent University · BEMedtronic (Switzerland) · CHRegina General Hospital · CAUniversité de Poitiers · FRUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough results of case series support the use of spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients with predominant low back pain, no confirmatory randomized controlled trial has been undertaken in this patient group to date. PROMISE is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study designed to compare the clinical effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation plus optimal medical management with optimal medical management alone in patients with failed back surgery syndrome and predominant low back pain. METHOD/

designPatients will be recruited in approximately 30 centers across Canada, Europe, and the United States. Eligible patients with low back pain exceeding leg pain and an average Numeric Pain Rating Scale score ≥5 for low back pain will be randomized 1:1 to spinal cord stimulation plus optimal medical management or to optimal medical management alone. The investigators will tailor individual optimal medical management treatment plans to their patients. Excluded from study treatments are intrathecal drug delivery, peripheral nerve stimulation, back surgery related to the original back pain complaint, and experimental therapies. Patients randomized to the spinal cord stimulation group will undergo trial stimulation, and if they achieve adequate low back pain relief a neurostimulation system using the Specify® 5-6-5 multi-column lead (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) will be implanted to capture low back pain preferentially in these patients. Outcome assessment will occur at baseline (pre-randomization) and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months post randomization. After the 6-month visit, patients can change treatment to that received by the other randomized group. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in low back pain at the 6-month visit. Additional outcomes include changes in low back and leg pain, functional disability, health-related quality of life, return to work, healthcare utilization including medication usage, and patient satisfaction. Data on adverse events will be collected. The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Healthcare use data will be used to assess costs and long-term cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: Recruitment began in January 2013 and will continue until 2016.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT01697358 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

Spinal Cord StimulationAnalgesicsCanadaClinical ProtocolsDisability EvaluationEuropeHumansLow Back PainOrthopedic ProceduresPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionResearch DesignReturn to WorkSpinal CordAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID24195916
PMCPMC4226255
OpenAlexW2099712321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.