ArticleBMC public health2013
A comparative analysis of early child health and development services and outcomes in countries with different redistributive policies.
Article in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening for Postpartum Depression in Well-Baby Care Settings: A Systematic Review.Maternal and child health journal · 2017Pooled it
- Addressing social determinants of health and equity in early childhood: a qualitative document analysis of national policies in Ecuador.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Can early prenatal care initiation reduce racial inequalities in birth outcomes? A causal decomposition approach.SSM - population health · 2025Article
- Fostering Tomorrow: Uniting Artificial Intelligence and Social Pediatrics for Comprehensive Child Well-being.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2024Article
- The association between perchlorate in drinking water and height and weight of children and adolescents in Southwest China: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Early (years) reactions: comparative analysis of early childhood policies and programs during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Population-based approaches for monitoring the nurturing care environment for early childhood development: A scoping review.Maternal & child nutrition · 2022Article
- Exploring the Associations between Early Childhood Development Outcomes and Ecological Country-Level Factors across Low- and Middle-Income Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Linking political exposures to child and maternal health outcomes: a realist review.BMC public health · 2021Review
- A Realist Synthesis of Literature Informing Programme Theories for Well Child Care in Primary Health Systems of Developed Economies.International journal of integrated care · 2019Article
- Preterm Birth in the Context of Increasing Income Inequality.Maternal and child health journal · 2016Article
- Causes of child mortality (1 to 4 years of age) from 1983 to 2012 in the Republic of Korea: national vital data.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe social environment is a fundamental determinant of early child development and, in turn, early child development is a determinant of health, well-being, and learning skills across the life course. Redistributive policies aimed at reducing social inequalities, such as a welfare state and labour market policies, have shown a positive association with selected health indicators. In this study, we investigated the influence of redistributive policies specifically on the social environment of early child development in five countries with different political traditions. The objective of this analysis was to highlight similarities and differences in social and health services between the countries and their associations with other health outcomes that can inform better global early child development policies and improve early child health and development.
methodsFour social determinants of early child development were selected to provide a cross-section of key time periods in a child's life from prenatal to kindergarten. They included: 1) prenatal care, 2) maternal leave, 3) child health care, and 4) child care and early childhood education. We searched international databases and reports (e.g. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, World Bank, and UNICEF) to obtain information about early child development policies, services and outcomes.
resultsAlthough a comparative analysis cannot claim causation, our analysis suggests that redistributive policies aimed at reducing social inequalities are associated with a positive influence on the social determinants of early child development. Generous redistributive policies are associated with a higher maternal leave allowance and pay and more preventive child healthcare visits. A decreasing trend in infant mortality, low birth weight rate, and under five mortality rate were observed with an increase in redistributive policies. No clear influence of redistributive policies was observed on breastfeeding and immunization rates. In the analysis of child care and early education, the lack of uniform measures of early child development outcomes was apparent.
conclusionsThis paper provides further support for an association between redistributive policies and early child health and development outcomes, along with the organization of early child health and development services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.