ArticlePloS one2013
The encoding of individual identity in dolphin signature whistles: how much information is needed?
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Greater Caribbean manatee vocalization detection across habitats using neural networks.PloS one · 2026Article
- Multiclass CNN Approach for Automatic Classification of Dolphin Vocalizations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Automatic detection for bioacoustic research: a practical guide from and for biologists and computer scientists.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- Vocal complexity in a socially complex corvid: gradation, diversity and lack of common call repertoire in male rooks.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- First acoustic evidence of signature whistle production by spinner dolphins (Stenella longirostris).Animal cognition · 2023Article
- Individual identity information persists in learned calls of introduced parrot populations.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Lessons learned in animal acoustic cognition through comparisons with humans.Animal cognition · 2023Review
- Deep audio embeddings for vocalisation clustering.PloS one · 2023Article
- Introducing the Software CASE (Cluster and Analyze Sound Events) by Comparing Different Clustering Methods and Audio Transformation Techniques Using Animal Vocalizations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Moderate evidence for heritability in the duet contributions of a South American primate.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2022Article
- Vocal universals and geographic variations in the acoustic repertoire of the common bottlenose dolphin.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Individual Differences in the Vocal Communication of Malayan Tapirs (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- DeepSqueak: a deep learning-based system for detection and analysis of ultrasonic vocalizations.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019Article
- Everyday bat vocalizations contain information about emitter, addressee, context, and behavior.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Orca Behavior and Subsequent Aggression Associated with Oceanarium Confinement.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2016Article
- Acoustic sequences in non-human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2016Review
- Vocal individuality cues in the African penguin (Spheniscus demersus): a source-filter theory approach.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Article
- An image processing based paradigm for the extraction of tonal sounds in cetacean communications.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) produce many vocalisations, including whistles that are unique to the individual producing them. Such "signature whistles" play a role in individual recognition and maintaining group integrity. Previous work has shown that humans can successfully group the spectrographic representations of signature whistles according to the individual dolphins that produced them. However, attempts at using mathematical algorithms to perform a similar task have been less successful. A greater understanding of the encoding of identity information in signature whistles is important for assessing similarity of whistles and thus social influences on the development of these learned calls. We re-examined 400 signature whistles from 20 individual dolphins used in a previous study, and tested the performance of new mathematical algorithms. We compared the measure used in the original study (correlation matrix of evenly sampled frequency measurements) to one used in several previous studies (similarity matrix of time-warped whistles), and to a new algorithm based on the Parsons code, used in music retrieval databases. The Parsons code records the direction of frequency change at each time step, and is effective at capturing human perception of music. We analysed similarity matrices from each of these three techniques, as well as a random control, by unsupervised clustering using three separate techniques: k-means clustering, hierarchical clustering, and an adaptive resonance theory neural network. For each of the three clustering techniques, a seven-level Parsons algorithm provided better clustering than the correlation and dynamic time warping algorithms, and was closer to the near-perfect visual categorisations of human judges. Thus, the Parsons code captures much of the individual identity information present in signature whistles, and may prove useful in studies requiring quantification of whistle similarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.