Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24194882›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

The influence of physical and physiological cues on atomic force microscopy-based cell stiffness assessment.

Yu-Wei Chiou, Hsiu-Kuan Lin, Ming-Jer Tang, Hsi-Hui Lin, Ming-Long Yeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. TheMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) Applications in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Ultrastructure and Nanomorphology of the American Mink (Mustela vison) Kidney.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu-Wei ChiouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Hsiu-Kuan Lin
Ming-Jer Tang
Hsi-Hui Lin
Ming-Long Yeh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomic force microscopy provides a novel technique for differentiating the mechanical properties of various cell types. Cell elasticity is abundantly used to represent the structural strength of cells in different conditions. In this study, we are interested in whether physical or physiological cues affect cell elasticity in Atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based assessments. The physical cues include the geometry of the AFM tips, the indenting force and the operating temperature of the AFM. All of these cues show a significant influence on the cell elasticity assessment. Sharp AFM tips create a two-fold increase in the value of the effective Young's modulus (E(eff)) relative to that of the blunt tips. Higher indenting force at the same loading rate generates higher estimated cell elasticity. Increasing the operation temperature of the AFM leads to decreases in the cell stiffness because the structure of actin filaments becomes disorganized. The physiological cues include the presence of fetal bovine serum or extracellular matrix-coated surfaces, the culture passage number, and the culture density. Both fetal bovine serum and the extracellular matrix are critical for cells to maintain the integrity of actin filaments and consequently exhibit higher elasticity. Unlike primary cells, mouse kidney progenitor cells can be passaged and maintain their morphology and elasticity for a very long period without a senescence phenotype. Finally, cell elasticity increases with increasing culture density only in MDCK epithelial cells. In summary, for researchers who use AFM to assess cell elasticity, our results provide basic and significant information about the suitable selection of physical and physiological cues.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCattleCell CountDogsElasticityExtracellular MatrixFluorescent Antibody TechniqueKidneyMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsMiceMicroscopy, Atomic ForceStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID24194882
PMCPMC3806741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.