ReviewFrontiers in plant science2013
Quantification of Förster resonance energy transfer by monitoring sensitized emission in living plant cells.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Blue-Green Emitting Oxadiazole: Photophysical, Solvatochromic, and FRET Studies with Core-Shell Quantum Dots.Journal of fluorescence · 2026Article
- Protein-protein interaction detection in plants: from classical approaches to future perspectives.Biologia futura · 2026Review
- Article
- Assessment of DNase Activity by Ratiometric Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2025Article
- Fluorescence-based spectrometric and imaging methods and machine learning analyses for microbiota analysis.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
- Near-Infrared Autofluorescence Imaging of Nuclei in Living Plant Roots.Bio-protocol · 2025Article
- Optimization of FRET imaging in Arabidopsis protoplasts.Molecules and cells · 2025Article
- Pursuing excitonic energy transfer with programmable DNA-based optical breadboards.Chemical Society reviews · 2023Review
- Multiplexed imaging for probing RAS-RAF interactions in living cells.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2023Article
- A MOF/DNA luminescent sensing platform for detection of potential COVID-19 biomarkers and drugs.Chemical science · 2023Article
- Characterization of the Interactions between Minocycline Hydrochloride and Trypsin with Spectroscopic and Molecular Docking Technology.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Mode of binding, kinetic and thermodynamic properties of a lipid-like drug (Fingolimod) interacting with Human Serum Albumin.BioImpacts : BI · 2023Article
- Three-Fluorophore FRET Enables the Analysis of Ternary Protein Association in Living Plant Cells.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Preferential Gs protein coupling of the galanin GalPharmacological research · 2022Article
- Intracellular imaging of metmyoglobin and oxygen using new dual purpose probe EYFP-Myoglobin-mCherry.Journal of biophotonics · 2022Article
- Interactome of Arabidopsis Thaliana.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Bioimaging tools move plant physiology studies forward.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Visualization of the protein-protein interactions of hormone receptors in hormone-dependent cancer research.Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2022Review
- Advances in Two-Photon Imaging in Plants.Plant & cell physiology · 2021Review
- Chloroplast-derived photo-oxidative stress causes changes in H2O2 and EGSH in other subcellular compartments.Plant physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) describes excitation energy exchange between two adjacent molecules typically in distances ranging from 2 to 10 nm. The process depends on dipole-dipole coupling of the molecules and its probability of occurrence cannot be proven directly. Mostly, fluorescence is employed for quantification as it represents a concurring process of relaxation of the excited singlet state S1 so that the probability of fluorescence decreases as the probability of FRET increases. This reflects closer proximity of the molecules or an orientation of donor and acceptor transition dipoles that facilitates FRET. Monitoring sensitized emission by 3-Filter-FRET allows for fast image acquisition and is suitable for quantifying FRET in dynamic systems such as living cells. In recent years, several calibration protocols were established to overcome to previous difficulties in measuring FRET-efficiencies. Thus, we can now obtain by 3-filter FRET FRET-efficiencies that are comparable to results from sophisticated fluorescence lifetime measurements. With the discovery of fluorescent proteins and their improvement toward spectral variants and usability in plant cells, the tool box for in vivo FRET-analyses in plant cells was provided and FRET became applicable for the in vivo detection of protein-protein interactions and for monitoring conformational dynamics. The latter opened the door toward a multitude of FRET-sensors such as the widely applied Ca(2+)-sensor Cameleon. Recently, FRET-couples of two fluorescent proteins were supplemented by additional fluorescent proteins toward FRET-cascades in order to monitor more complex arrangements. Novel FRET-couples involving switchable fluorescent proteins promise to increase the utility of FRET through combination with photoactivation-based super-resolution microscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.