Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24194435›Full record

ReviewDrugs2013

Prucalopride: a review of its use in the management of chronic constipation.

Gillian M Keating

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. New Options in Constipation Management.Current oncology reports · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gillian M KeatingAdis, 41 Centorian Drive, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, North Shore, 0754, Auckland, New Zealand, demail@springer.com.
North Shore Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The highly selective serotonin 5-HT4 receptor agonist prucalopride (Resolor(®), Resotran(®), Resotrans(®)) is indicated for the treatment of chronic constipation. In four randomized, double-blind, multicentre, 12-week trials in patients (predominantly women) with chronic constipation, oral prucalopride 2 mg once daily improved bowel function to a significantly greater extent than placebo, with a significantly greater proportion of prucalopride than placebo recipients achieving an average of ≥3 spontaneous, complete bowel movements per week (primary endpoint). Significantly greater improvements in health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction with treatment and bowel habit, and a range of constipation-related symptoms were also seen with prucalopride than with placebo. Satisfaction with treatment and bowel habit was maintained with prucalopride in the longer term. Prucalopride was generally well tolerated in patients with chronic constipation, with the most commonly reported adverse events (headache, nausea, abdominal pain, diarrhoea) primarily occurring on the first day of treatment. During the clinical trials, no cardiovascular safety issues have arisen in patients with chronic constipation receiving prucalopride. In conclusion, prucalopride is an important option for use in patients with chronic constipation who have not experienced adequate relief with laxatives.

Indexed as

BenzofuransChronic DiseaseConstipationHumansPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSerotonin 5-HT4 Receptor AgonistsTime FactorsBenzofuransprucaloprideSerotonin 5-HT4 Receptor Agonists

Identifiers

PMID24194435
OpenAlexW1988760026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.