ReviewDrugs2013
Prucalopride: a review of its use in the management of chronic constipation.
Review in Drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opioid-Induced Constipation and Bowel Dysfunction: A Clinical Guideline.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2017Guideline
- Use of Prucalopride for Chronic Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2016Pooled it
- Current Opinion on Prucalopride in Gastroparesis and Chronic Constipation Treatment: A Focus on Patient Selection and Safety.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2021Review
- New therapeutic perspectives in irritable bowel syndrome: Targeting low-grade inflammation, immuno-neuroendocrine axis, motility, secretion and beyond.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Review
- New Options in Constipation Management.Current oncology reports · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The highly selective serotonin 5-HT4 receptor agonist prucalopride (Resolor(®), Resotran(®), Resotrans(®)) is indicated for the treatment of chronic constipation. In four randomized, double-blind, multicentre, 12-week trials in patients (predominantly women) with chronic constipation, oral prucalopride 2 mg once daily improved bowel function to a significantly greater extent than placebo, with a significantly greater proportion of prucalopride than placebo recipients achieving an average of ≥3 spontaneous, complete bowel movements per week (primary endpoint). Significantly greater improvements in health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction with treatment and bowel habit, and a range of constipation-related symptoms were also seen with prucalopride than with placebo. Satisfaction with treatment and bowel habit was maintained with prucalopride in the longer term. Prucalopride was generally well tolerated in patients with chronic constipation, with the most commonly reported adverse events (headache, nausea, abdominal pain, diarrhoea) primarily occurring on the first day of treatment. During the clinical trials, no cardiovascular safety issues have arisen in patients with chronic constipation receiving prucalopride. In conclusion, prucalopride is an important option for use in patients with chronic constipation who have not experienced adequate relief with laxatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.