Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24193797›Full record

ArticleStroke2013

Stroke treatment academic industry roundtable: research priorities in the assessment of neurothrombectomy devices.

Jeffrey L Saver, Tudor G Jovin, Wade S Smith, Gregory W Albers, Jean-Claude Baron, Johannes Boltze, Joseph P Broderick, Lisa A Davis, Andrew M Demchuk, Salvatore DeSena and 27 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Nucleic Acid Therapies for Ischemic Stroke.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Jeffrey L SaverFrom the Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (J.L.S.); Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Stroke Institute, PA (T.G.J.); Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco (W.S.S.); and Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA (G.W.A.).
Tudor G Jovin
Wade S Smith
Gregory W Albers
Jean-Claude Baron
Johannes Boltze
Joseph P Broderick
Lisa A Davis
Andrew M Demchuk
Salvatore DeSena
Jens Fiehler
Philip B Gorelick
Werner Hacke
Bill Holt
Reza Jahan
Hui Jing
Pooja Khatri
Chelsea S Kidwell
Kennedy R Lees
Michael H Lev
David S Liebeskind
Marie Luby
Patrick Lyden
J Thomas Megerian
J Mocco
Keith W Muir
Howard A Rowley
Richard M Ruedy
Sean I Savitz
Vitas J Sipelis
Samuel K Shimp
Lawrence R Wechsler
Max Wintermark
Ona Wu
Dileep R Yavagal
Albert J Yoo
STAIR VIII Consortium
Chelsea Technologies (United Kingdom) · GBEmam Reza Hospital · IRExelis (United States) · USHanalei Watershed Hui · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USSamueli Institute · USSan Salvatore Hospital · ITStanford Medicine · USStanford University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USWerner-Wicker-Klinik · DEW. L. Gore & Associates (Germany) · DE

Funding

NOVEL INSIGHTS INTO CEREBRAL ISCHEMIC PATHOPHYSIOLOGY IN HUMANSZIANS003043 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI LATOUR, LAWRENCE · 2009 to 2025
$19.5M
Miami Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000460 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SACCO, RALPH L. · 2012 to 2016
$16.9M
Modeling of Collateral Perfusion in the Ischemic BrainK24NS072272 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LIEBESKIND, DAVID SIGMUND · 2011 to 2015
$939k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000460NINDS NIH HHS K24 NS072272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe goal of the Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) meetings is to advance the development of stroke therapies. At STAIR VIII, consensus recommendations were developed for clinical trial strategies to demonstrate the benefit of endovascular reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Prospects for success with forthcoming endovascular trials are robust, because new neurothrombectomy devices have superior reperfusion efficacy compared with earlier-generation interventions. Specific recommendations are provided for trial designs in 3 populations: (1) patients undergoing intravenous fibrinolysis, (2) early patients ineligible for or having failed intravenous fibrinolysis, and (3) wake-up and other late-presenting patients. Among intravenous fibrinolysis-eligible patients, key principles are that CT or MRI confirmation of target arterial occlusions should precede randomization; endovascular intervention should be pursued with the greatest rapidity possible; and combined intravenous and neurothrombectomy therapy is more promising than neurothrombectomy alone. Among patients ineligible for or having failed intravenous fibrinolysis, scientific equipoise was affirmed and the need to randomize all eligible patients emphasized. Vessel imaging to confirm occlusion is mandatory, and infarct core and penumbral imaging is desirable in later time windows. Additional STAIR VIII recommendations include approaches to test multiple devices in a single trial, utility weighting of disability end points, and adaptive designs to delineate time and tissue injury thresholds at which benefits from intervention no longer accrue.

conclusionsEndovascular research priorities in acute ischemic stroke are to perform trials testing new, highly effective neuro thrombectomy devices rapidly deployed in patients confirmed to have target vessel occlusions.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicResearch DesignBrain IschemiaFibrinolytic AgentsHumansStrokeThrombectomyThrombolytic TherapyFibrinolytic Agentsendovascular recanalizationischemicreperfusionstroke

Identifiers

PMID24193797
PMCPMC4142766
OpenAlexW2161823903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.