Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24193571›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2014

The influence of comprehensive geriatric assessment on drug therapy in elderly patients.

Michael Due Larsen, Jens Ulrik Rosholm, Jesper Hallas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Risk of prescribing errors in acutely admitted patients: a pilot study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael Due LarsenClinical Pharmacology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, michael.due.larsen@rsyd.dk.
Jens Ulrik Rosholm
Jesper Hallas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComprehensive geriatric assessment of hospitalised patients implies optimising patients' medical treatment, and good coordination between hospital and general practice is essential for the quality of the drug treatment. Only a few studies have investigated the continuation of patients' medication from primary care to hospital and back again to primary care.

objectivesTo describe changes of drug therapy during hospital stay in a geriatric ward and the following acceptance of these changes in primary cares after discharge.

methodsAn observational register study following 1,550 geriatric patients' pharmacological treatment longitudinally across hospital stay, by linkage of a primary care prescription database and hospital medical records. The medication regimens for the individual patients were compared at three cross sections: primary care before hospitalisation, during hospital stay and primary care after hospitalisation, analysed according to drug therapy, co-morbidity, functionality and outpatient follow-up.

resultsPatients were using an average of 8.2 drugs before hospital admission, of which an average of 0.9 drugs per patient was discontinued or switched during hospitalisation. An average of 1.7 new drugs per patient was initiated by the hospital physicians. After discharge, 63.9 % of the changes initiated by hospital physicians were continued in primary care. Of new drugs initiated in hospital 42.7 % were accepted in primary care.

conclusionsA relatively small proportion of drugs was switched or discontinued and the average number of drugs increased during hospital stay. Of these changes, two thirds were accepted in primary care after discharge and less than half of newly initiated drugs were continued in primary.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overDenmarkDrug TherapyDrug UtilizationFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, UniversityHumansMalePatient DischargePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.