Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24193373›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2013

Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Jennifer Maranki, Paul Yeaton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Why is the rectal route for NSAIDS favorable for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis?Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer MarankiTemple University School of Medicine, 3401 N. Broad St., Suite 830 Parkinson Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA, jennifer.maranki@tuhs.temple.edu.
Paul Yeaton
Temple University · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatitis is one of the most common complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A variety of patient-related and procedure-related factors have been identified to risk-stratify patients. Several measures can be undertaken in order to decrease the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk groups. These measures include pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin, amongst others.

Indexed as

Administration, RectalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeHormonesHumansIndomethacinPancreatic DuctsPancreatitisPatient SelectionProtease InhibitorsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStentsVasodilator AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHormonesIndomethacinProtease InhibitorsVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID24193373
OpenAlexW1978327717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.