ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2013
Sonication of antibiotic-loaded cement spacers in a two-stage revision protocol for infected joint arthroplasty.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sonication fluid culture of antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer has high accuracy to confirm eradication of infection before reimplantation of new prostheses.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Pooled it
- Biomaterials approaches to treating implant-associated osteomyelitis.Biomaterials · 2016Pooled it
- Unsatisfactory outcome of arthrodesis performed after septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2015Trial
- Real Component Spacers for Two-Stage Exchange Demonstrate Low Bacterial Colonization.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Upcoming evidence in clinical practice of two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024Review
- Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- Role of bacterial colonisation of vancomycin-gentamicin spacers in two-stage arthroplasty revision surgery: the usefulness of spacer sonication.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022Observational
- The Function of Sonication in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2022Review
- Against the Norm: Do Not Rely on Serum C-Reactive Protein and White Blood Cell Count Only When Assessing Eradication of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Bioinspired Polydopamine Coatings Facilitate Attachment of Antimicrobial Peptidomimetics with Broad-Spectrum Antibacterial Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Are Cement Spacers and Beads Loaded with the Correct Antibiotic(s) at the Site of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Successful Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Impact of Timing on Eradication of Infection.International journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
- Clinical effects of staged joint replacement in patients with septic arthritic knee.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
- Is There a Role for Spacer Exchange in Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection?Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Bacterial biofilm formation is variably inhibited by different formulations of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in vitro.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019Article
- High cure rate of periprosthetic hip joint infection with multidisciplinary team approach using standardized two-stage exchange.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2019Observational
- Article
- Sonication Culture of Antimicrobial Agent-Containing Cement Spacers Removed during Staged Revisions for Arthroplasty Infection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Article
- Safety of Temporary Use of Recycled Autoclaved Femoral Components in Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: Confirming Sterility Using a Sonication Method.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2018Article
- Are Sonication Cultures of Antibiotic Cement Spacers Useful During Second-stage Reimplantation Surgery for Prosthetic Joint Infection?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCulturing of the sonication fluid of removed implants has proven to be more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic tissue culture for the microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Since bacteria surviving on antibiotic-loaded cement spacers used in a two-stage exchange protocol for infected arthroplasties may cause the persistence of infection, in this study we asked whether the sonication also could be used to identify bacteria on antibiotic-loaded cement spacers removed at the second surgical stage during a two-stage exchange procedure to confirm whether or not the prosthetic joint infection had been eradicated.
methodsWe cultured the sonication fluid of cement spacers that had been originally implanted in a two-stage exchange protocol in 21 patients (mean age, 66 years) affected by prosthetic joint infection (16 total knee prostheses and 5 hip prostheses). The cement spacers were vortexed for 30 seconds and then subjected to sonication (frequency 35-40 KHz). The resulting sonicate fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.
resultsThe sonication fluid culture of the removed spacer was positive in six patients (29%), with isolation of methicillin-sensible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) in three cases, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in one case and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in two cases. In three of these positive cases, the traditional culture of periprosthetic tissue was negative. Two patients with positive sonication culture of the spacer were successfully treated by early debridement of the revision prosthesis and systemic antibiotic therapy. In three patients a knee arthrodesis was planned and performed as the second surgical stage. In two of them the infection was caused by highly resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. The other patient with a MSSA infection had been poorly compliant with the systemic antibiotic therapy due to her mental impairment. The patient originally affected by MRSA infection of his primary hip arthroplasty developed recurrent infection of his revision prosthesis and eventually underwent Girdlestone arthroplasty.
conclusionsThe sonication culture can be used to discover any bacteria on the antibiotic-loaded cement spacer during a two-stage exchange protocol, thus permitting the adoption of timely treatment options, such as the early prosthetic debridment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.