Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24192071›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical periodontology2013

Assessing periodontitis in populations: a systematic review of the validity of partial-mouth examination protocols.

Duong T Tran, Isabel Gay, Xianglin L Du, Yunxin Fu, Richard D Bebermeyer, Ana S Neumann, Charles Streckfus, Wenyaw Chan, Muhammad F Walji

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical periodontology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. OralDentistry journal · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Duong T TranSchool of Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Isabel Gay
Xianglin L Du
Yunxin Fu
Richard D Bebermeyer
Ana S Neumann
Charles Streckfus
Wenyaw Chan
Muhammad F Walji

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
Development of an Inter-University Oral Health Research DatabaseG08LM010075 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI WALJI, MUHAMMAD · 2009 to 2011
$401k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NLM NIH HHS G08 LM010075NLM NIH HHS G08LM010075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate bias associated with partial-mouth periodontal examination (PMPE) protocols regarding estimates of prevalence, severity and extent of clinical attachment loss (CAL), pocket depth (PD) and gingival recession (REC). MATERIAL AND

methodsA search was made for articles published in English, from 1946 to 2012, which compared PMPE versus full-mouth periodontal examination protocols for CAL or PD ≥ 4 mm or REC ≥3 mm thresholds. PMPE protocols were evaluated for sensitivity of estimates of periodontitis prevalence, relative biases for severity and extent estimates.

resultsA review of the literature identified 12 studies which reported 32 PMPE protocols. Three PMPE protocols which had sensitivities ≥85% and relative biases ≤0.05 in absolute values for severity and extent estimates were as follows: (1) half-mouth six-sites, (2) diagonal quadrants six-sites and (3) full-mouth mesiobuccal-midbuccal-distobuccal (MB-B-DB). Two other PMPE protocols (full-mouth and half-mouth mesiobuccal-midbuccal-distolingual) performed well for prevalence and severity of periodontitis; however, their performance in estimates of extent was unknown.

conclusionsAmong the 32 PMPE protocols listed, the half-mouth six-sites and full-mouth MB-B-DB protocols had the highest sensitivities for prevalence estimates and lowest relative biases for severity and extent estimates.

Indexed as

Periodontal IndexBiasGingival RecessionHumansPeriodontal Attachment LossPeriodontal PocketPeriodontitisPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificitypartial-mouth examination protocolsperiodontal indicesperiodontitisperiodontitis prevalence

Identifiers

PMID24192071
PMCPMC3859863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.