Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24191955›Full record

SynthesisExpert review of anti-infective therapy2013

On the pathway to better birth outcomes? A systematic review of azithromycin and curable sexually transmitted infections.

R Matthew Chico, Berkin B Hack, Melanie J Newport, Enesia Ngulube, Daniel Chandramohan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Expert review of anti-infective therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R Matthew ChicoLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Berkin B Hack
Melanie J Newport
Enesia Ngulube
Daniel Chandramohan
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 100715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WHO recommends the administration of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) to all pregnant women living in areas of moderate (stable) to high malaria transmission during scheduled antenatal visits, beginning in the second trimester and continuing to delivery. Malaria parasites have lost sensitivity to SP in many endemic areas, prompting the investigation of alternatives that include azithromycin-based combination (ABC) therapies. Use of ABC therapies may also confer protection against curable sexually transmitted infections and reproductive tract infections (STIs/RTIs). The magnitude of protection at the population level would depend on the efficacy of the azithromycin-based regimen used and the underlying prevalence of curable STIs/RTIs among pregnant women who receive preventive treatment. This systematic review summarizes the efficacy data of azithromycin against curable STIs/RTIs.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinClinical Trials as TopicDrug CombinationsDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansMalaria, FalciparumMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePyrimethamineReproductive Tract InfectionsSexually Transmitted DiseasesSulfadoxineAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinDrug Combinationsfanasil, pyrimethamine drug combinationPyrimethamineSulfadoxine

Identifiers

PMID24191955
PMCPMC3906303
OpenAlexW1980391945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.