Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24191196›Full record

ReviewMinimally invasive surgery2013

Neuroendoscopic resection of intraventricular tumors: a systematic outcomes analysis.

Sean M Barber, Leonardo Rangel-Castilla, David Baskin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Minimally invasive surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04569201 (Endoscopic and Endoscopic-Assisted Microsurgery of Intraventricular Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04569201 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Endoscopic and Endoscopic-Assisted Microsurgery of Intraventricular Lesions: Efficacy of Technique and Outcome Assessment

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsEndoscopy in Intraventricular LesionsArmsEndoscope
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Endoport-Guided Endoscopic Excision of Intraaxial Brain Tumors.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Endoscopic Keyhole Approach for Intracranial Epidermoid.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Three-Dimensional, computer simulated navigation in endoscopic neurosurgery.Interdisciplinary neurosurgery : Advanced techniques and case management · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean M BarberHouston Methodist Neurological Institute, Department of Neurological Surgery, Suite 944, 6560 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Leonardo Rangel-Castilla
David Baskin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction. Though traditional microsurgical techniques are the gold standard for intraventricular tumor resection, the morbidity and invasiveness of microsurgical approaches to the ventricular system have galvanized interest in neuroendoscopic resection. We present a systematic review of the literature to provide a better understanding of the virtues and limitations of endoscopic tumor resection. Materials and Methods. 40 articles describing 668 endoscopic tumor resections were selected from the Pubmed database and reviewed. Results. Complete or near-complete resection was achieved in 75.0% of the patients. 9.9% of resected tumors recurred during the follow-up period, and procedure-related complications occurred in 20.8% of the procedures. Tumor size ≤ 2cm (P = 0.00146), the presence of a cystic tumor component (P < 0.0001), and the use of navigation or stereotactic tools during the procedure (P = 0.0003) were each independently associated with a greater likelihood of complete or near-complete tumor resection. Additionally, the complication rate was significantly higher for noncystic masses than for cystic ones (P < 0.0001). Discussion. Neuroendoscopic outcomes for intraventricular tumor resection are significantly better when performed on small, cystic tumors and when neural navigation or stereotaxy is used. Conclusion. Neuroendoscopic resection appears to be a safe and reliable treatment option for patients with intraventricular tumors of a particular morphology.

Identifiers

PMID24191196
PMCPMC3804403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.