Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24190916›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2014

The unique α4+/-α4 agonist binding site in (α4)3(β2)2 subtype nicotinic acetylcholine receptors permits differential agonist desensitization pharmacology versus the (α4)2(β2)3 subtype.

J Brek Eaton, Linda M Lucero, Harrison Stratton, Yongchang Chang, John F Cooper, Jon M Lindstrom, Ronald J Lukas, Paul Whiteaker

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Analogs of α-conotoxin PnIC selectively inhibit α7β2- over α7-only subtype nicotinic acetylcholine receptors via a novel allosteric mechanism.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Concatemers to re-investigate the role of α5 in α4β2 nicotinic receptors.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Article
  11. Implications of Oligomeric Amyloid-Beta (oAβThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Potentiation of a neuronal nicotinic receptor via pseudo-agonist site.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Stoichiometry of the Heteromeric Nicotinic Receptors of the Renshaw Cell.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cognitive Effects of Nicotine: Recent Progress.Current neuropharmacology · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Brek EatonDivision of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurologic Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (J.B.E., L.M.L., H.S., Y.C., R.J.L., P.W.); and Department of Neuroscience, Medical School of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.F.C., J.M.L.).
Linda M Lucero
Harrison Stratton
Yongchang Chang
John F Cooper
Jon M Lindstrom
Ronald J Lukas
Paul Whiteaker
Barrow Neurological Institute · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Project 3 University of Colorado, BoulderU19DA019375 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MARKS, MICHAEL J · 2005 to 2014
$8.3M
STUDIES USING PURIFIED ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORSR01NS011323 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LINDSTROM, JON MARTIN · 1985 to 2012
$5.0M
Design and Study of New Nicotinic Analogs for Use in DepressionU19MH085193 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KOZIKOWSKI, ALAN P. · 2009 to 2013
$4.5M
ALPHA-CONOTOXIN MII--SELECTIVE NICOTINIC RECEPTOR PROBER01DA012242 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI WHITEAKER, PAUL · 1999 to 2011
$3.5M
Synthesis of Bupropion Analogs, Including Possible Metabolites and 3-PhenyltropanU19DA019377 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI LUKAS, RONALD JOHN · 2005 to 2009
$3.4M
Molecular Bases for Effects of NicotineR01DA015389 · NIDA · ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER · PI LUKAS, RONALD J · 2003 to 2007
$1.6M
Chemistry and Pharmacology of a New Nicotine LigandsR01DA017980 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KOZIKOWSKI, ALAN PAUL · 2003 to 2007
$1.4M
Structural dynamics underlying rho1 GABAC receptor activation and antagonismR01GM085237 · NIGMS · ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHANG, YONGCHANG · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
Construction and Expression of Concatemeric alpha6beta2* Nicotinic Acetycholine RR21DA026627 · NIDA · ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER · PI WHITEAKER, PAUL · 2009 to 2010
$407k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012242NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA012242NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015389NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA015389NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017980NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA017980NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA026627NIDA NIH HHS R21-DA026627NIDA NIH HHS U19 DA019375NIDA NIH HHS U19-DA019375NIDA NIH HHS U19 DA019377NIDA NIH HHS U19-DA019377NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085237NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM085237NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH085193NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH085193NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS011323NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS011323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selected nicotinic agonists were used to activate and desensitize high-sensitivity (HS) (α4)2(β2)3) or low-sensitivity (LS) (α4)3(β2)2) isoforms of human α4β2-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). Function was assessed using (86)Rb(+) efflux in a stably transfected SH-EP1-hα4β2 human epithelial cell line, and two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology in Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing concatenated pentameric HS or LS α4β2-nAChR constructs (HSP and LSP). Unlike previously studied agonists, desensitization by the highly selective agonists A-85380 [3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine] and sazetidine-A (Saz-A) preferentially reduced α4β2-nAChR HS-phase versus LS-phase responses. The concatenated-nAChR experiments confirmed that approximately 20% of LS-isoform acetylcholine-induced function occurs in an HS-like phase, which is abolished by Saz-A preincubation. Six mutant LSPs were generated, each targeting a conserved agonist binding residue within the LS-isoform-only α4(+)/(-)α4 interface agonist binding site. Every mutation reduced the percentage of LS-phase function, demonstrating that this site underpins LS-phase function. Oocyte-surface expression of the HSP and each of the LSP constructs was statistically indistinguishable, as measured using β2-subunit-specific [(125)I]mAb295 labeling. However, maximum function is approximately five times greater on a "per-receptor" basis for unmodified LSP versus HSP α4β2-nAChRs. Thus, recruitment of the α4(+)/(-)α4 site at higher agonist concentrations appears to augment otherwise-similar function mediated by the pair of α4(+)/(-)β2 sites shared by both isoforms. These studies elucidate the receptor-level differences underlying the differential pharmacology of the two α4β2-nAChR isoforms, and demonstrate that HS versus LS α4β2-nAChR activity can be selectively manipulated using pharmacological approaches. Since α4β2 nAChRs are the predominant neuronal subtype, these discoveries likely have significant functional implications, and may provide important insights for drug discovery and development.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCell LineCrystallography, X-RayDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansNicotinic AgonistsOocytesProtein SubunitsReceptors, NicotinicXenopus laevisNicotinic Agonistsnicotinic receptor alpha4beta2Protein SubunitsReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID24190916
PMCPMC3868879
OpenAlexW2152464205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.