Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24190872›Full record

ArticleJournal of chromatographic science2014

Determining urea levels in exhaled breath condensate with minimal preparation steps and classic LC-MS.

Masha Pitiranggon, Matthew S Perzanowski, Patrick L Kinney, Dongqun Xu, Steven N Chillrud, Beizhan Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chromatographic science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Masha PitiranggonLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Matthew S PerzanowskiDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Patrick L KinneyDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Dongqun XuInstitute for Environmental Health and Related Product Safety, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, PR China.
Steven N ChillrudLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA.
Beizhan YanLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA yanbz@ldeo.columbia.edu.

Funding

True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MATTHEW S PERZANOWSKI · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
Windows of Susceptibility to PAH/DEP Exposure and AsthmaP50ES015905 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PERERA, FREDERICA P · 2007 to 2011
$10.3M
Risk Factors Accounting for Neighborhood Differences in Asthma PrevalenceR01ES014400 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PERZANOWSKI, MATTHEW S · 2007 to 2010
$2.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS ES014400NIEHS NIH HHS ES015905NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS P50 ES015905NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) provides a relatively easy, non-invasive method for measuring biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in the airways. However, the levels of these biomarkers in EBC are influenced, not only by their levels in lung lining fluid but also by the volume of water vapor that also condenses during EBC collection. For this reason, the use of a biomarker of dilution has been recommended. Urea has been proposed and utilized as a promising dilution biomarker due to its even distribution throughout the body and relatively low volatility. Current EBC urea analytical methods either are not sensitive enough, necessitating large volumes of EBC, or are labor intensive, requiring a derivatization step or other pretreatment. We report here a straightforward and reliable LC-MS approach that we developed that does not require derivatization or large sample volume (∼36 µL). An Acclaim mixed-mode hydrophilic interaction chromatography column was selected because it can produce good peak symmetry and efficiently separate urea from other polar and nonpolar compounds. To achieve a high recovery rate, a slow and incomplete evaporation method was used followed by a solvent-phase exchange. Among EBC samples collected from 28 children, urea levels were found to be highly variable, with a relative standard deviation of 234%, suggesting high variability in dilution of the lung lining fluid component of EBC. The limit of detection was found to be 0.036 µg/mL.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBreath TestsChildChromatography, LiquidExhalationHumansLimit of DetectionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationUreaBiomarkersUrea

Identifiers

PMID24190872
PMCPMC4215077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.