Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24190075›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2013

Genomic evolution of the pathogenic Wolbachia strain, wMelPop.

Megan Woolfit, Iñaki Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Jeremy C Brownlie, Thomas Walker, Markus Riegler, Andrei Seleznev, Jean Popovici, Edwige Rancès, Bryan A Wee, Jennifer Pavlides and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparative analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Two male-killingRoyal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  11. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The cellular lives of Wolbachia.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. NewInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Transient Introgression ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Megan WoolfitSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Iñaki Iturbe-Ormaetxe
Jeremy C Brownlie
Thomas Walker
Markus Riegler
Andrei Seleznev
Jean Popovici
Edwige Rancès
Bryan A Wee
Jennifer Pavlides
Mitchell J Sullivan
Scott A Beatson
Amanda Lane
Manpreet Sidhu
Conor J McMeniman
Elizabeth A McGraw
Scott L O'Neill
The University of Queensland · AUGriffith University · AUMonash University · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most strains of the widespread endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia pipientis are benign or behave as reproductive parasites. The pathogenic strain wMelPop is a striking exception, however: it overreplicates in its insect hosts and causes severe life shortening. The mechanism of this pathogenesis is currently unknown. We have sequenced the genomes of three variants of wMelPop and of the closely related nonpathogenic strain wMelCS. We show that the genomes of wMelCS and wMelPop appear to be identical in the nonrepeat regions of the genome and differ detectably only by the triplication of a 19-kb region that is unlikely to be associated with life shortening, demonstrating that dramatic differences in the host phenotype caused by this endosymbiont may be the result of only minor genetic changes. We also compare the genomes of the original wMelPop strain from Drosophila melanogaster and two sequential derivatives, wMelPop-CLA and wMelPop-PGYP. To develop wMelPop as a novel biocontrol agent, it was first transinfected into and passaged in mosquito cell lines for approximately 3.5 years, generating wMelPop-CLA. This cell line-passaged strain was then transinfected into Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, creating wMelPop-PGYP, which was sequenced after 4 years in the insect host. We observe a rapid burst of genomic changes during cell line passaging, but no further mutations were detected after transinfection into mosquitoes, indicating either that host preadaptation had occurred in cell lines, that cell lines are a more selectively permissive environment than animal hosts, or both. Our results provide valuable data on the rates of genomic and phenotypic change in Wolbachia associated with host shifts over short time scales.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialAedesAnimalsBase SequenceCell LineDrosophila melanogasterGene DuplicationMolecular Sequence DataMutationSelection, GeneticVirulenceWolbachiaendosymbiontevolutiongenomicsWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID24190075
PMCPMC3845649
OpenAlexW2133987583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.