Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24189127›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2014

Gender trends in radiation oncology in the United States: a 30-year analysis.

Awad A Ahmed, Brian Egleston, Emma Holliday, Gary Eastwick, Cristiane Takita, Reshma Jagsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Gender disparities in academic radiation oncology research: A narrative review.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Developing a Dedicated Leadership Curriculum for Radiation Oncology Residents.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Can Sex and Seniority Predict the Quality of a Journal Reviewer's Manuscript Critique?International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Awad A AhmedTemple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Brian EglestonDepartment of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Emma HollidayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Gary EastwickTemple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Cristiane TakitaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Reshma JagsiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: rjagsi@med.umich.edu.

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Clinical Trials with Exclusions Based on Race, Ethnicity, and English FluencyR03CA167264 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI EGLESTON, BRIAN L · 2013 to 2014
$176k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS P30CA006927NCI NIH HHS R03 CA167264NCI NIH HHS R03CA167264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough considerable research exists regarding the role of women in the medical profession in the United States, little work has described the participation of women in academic radiation oncology. We examined women's participation in authorship of radiation oncology literature, a visible and influential activity that merits specific attention. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We examined the gender of first and senior US physician-authors of articles published in the Red Journal in 1980, 1990, 2000, 2004, 2010, and 2012. The significance of trends over time was evaluated using logistic regression. Results were compared with female representation in journals of general medicine and other major medical specialties. Findings were also placed in the context of trends in the representation of women among radiation oncology faculty and residents over the past 3 decades, using Association of American Medical Colleges data.

resultsThe proportion of women among Red Journal first authors increased from 13.4% in 1980 to 29.7% in 2012, and the proportion among senior authors increased from 3.2% to 22.6%. The proportion of women among radiation oncology full-time faculty increased from 11% to 26.7% from 1980 to 2012. The proportion of women among radiation oncology residents increased from 27.1% to 33.3% from 1980 to 2010.

conclusionsFemale first and senior authorship in the Red Journal has increased significantly, as has women's participation among full-time faculty, but women remain underrepresented among radiation oncology residents compared with their representation in the medical student body. Understanding such trends is necessary to develop appropriately targeted interventions to improve gender equity in radiation oncology.

Indexed as

AuthorshipFaculty, MedicalBibliometricsFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyLogistic ModelsMalePeriodicals as TopicPhysicians, WomenRadiation OncologySex DistributionStudents, MedicalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24189127
PMCPMC3880121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.