Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24188807›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2013

A rabbit osteomyelitis model for the longitudinal assessment of early post-operative implant infections.

Jim C E Odekerken, Jacobus J C Arts, Don A M Surtel, Geert H I M Walenkamp, Tim J M Welting

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Model of Osteomyelitis in Rats.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Innovations in osteomyelitis research: A review of animal models.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Impact of Bacterial Infections on Osteogenesis: Evidence From In Vivo Studies.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jim C E Odekerken
Jacobus J C Arts
Don A M Surtel
Geert H I M Walenkamp
Tim J M WeltingLaboratory for Experimental Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P,O, Box 5800, Maastricht 6202 AZ, the Netherlands. t.welting@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplant infection is one of the most severe complications within the field of orthopaedic surgery, associated with an enormous burden for the healthcare system. During the last decades, attempts have been made to lower the incidence of implant-related infections. In the case of cemented prostheses, the use of antibiotic-containing bone cement can be effective. However, in the case of non-cemented prostheses, osteosynthesis and spinal surgery, local antibacterial prophylaxis is not a standard procedure. For the development of implant coatings with antibacterial properties, there is a need for a reliable animal model to evaluate the preventive capacity of such coatings during a specific period of time. Existing animal models generally present a limited follow-up, with a limited number of outcome parameters and relatively large animal numbers in multiple groups.

methodsTo represent an early post-operative implant infection, we established an acute tibial intramedullary nail infection model in rabbits by contamination of the tibial nail with 3.8 × 10⁵ colony forming units of Staphylococcus aureus. Clinical, haematological and radiological parameters for infection were weekly assessed during a 6-week follow-up with post-mortem bacteriological and histological analyses.

resultsS. aureus implant infection was confirmed by the above parameters. A saline control group did not develop osteomyelitis. By combining the clinical, haematological, radiological, bacteriological and histological data collected during the experimental follow-up, we were able to differentiate between the control and the infected condition and assess the severity of the infection at sequential timepoints in a parameter-dependent fashion.

conclusionWe herein present an acute early post-operative rabbit implant infection model which, in contrast to previously published models, combines improved in-time insight into the development of an implant osteomyelitis with a relatively low amount of animals.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAcute DiseaseAnimalsBone NailsColony Count, MicrobialEquipment ContaminationFemaleOsteomyelitisPhysical ExaminationProsthesis-Related InfectionsRabbitsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusTibiaX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID24188807
PMCPMC3828396
OpenAlexW2164586505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.