Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24188636›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2013

Basal ganglia output to the thalamus: still a paradox.

Jesse H Goldberg, Michael A Farries, Michale S Fee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jesse H GoldbergMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: jesse.goldberg@cornell.edu.
Michael A Farries
Michale S Fee

Funding

Neuronal Mechanisms of Motor Exploration in the SongbirdR01DC009183 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FEE, MICHALE S · 2008 to 2017
$3.1M
Basal Ganglia-Thalamic Interactions in Behaving Songbirds During LearningR00NS067062 · NINDS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDBERG, JESSE HEYMANN · 2012 to 2014
$738k
Basal Ganglia-Thalamic Interactions in Behaving Songbirds During LearningK99NS067062 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GOLDBERG, JESSE HEYMANN · 2010 to 2011
$269k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009183NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC009183NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS067062NINDS NIH HHS K99NS067062NINDS NIH HHS NS047985NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS067062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basal ganglia (BG)-recipient thalamus controls motor output but it remains unclear how its activity is regulated. Several studies report that thalamic activation occurs via disinhibition during pauses in the firing of inhibitory pallidal inputs from the BG. Other studies indicate that thalamic spiking is triggered by pallidal inputs via post-inhibitory 'rebound' calcium spikes. Finally excitatory cortical inputs can drive thalamic activity, which becomes entrained, or time-locked, to pallidal spikes. We present a unifying framework where these seemingly distinct results arise from a continuum of thalamic firing 'modes' controlled by excitatory inputs. We provide a mechanistic explanation for paradoxical pallidothalamic coactivations observed during behavior that raises new questions about what information is integrated in the thalamus to control behavior.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBasal GangliaHumansNeural PathwaysNeuronsThalamusbasal gangliabehaviorcortexthalamus

Identifiers

PMID24188636
PMCPMC3855885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.