Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24188462›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2013

Socioeconomic status, financial hardship and measured obesity in older adults: a cross-sectional study of the EPIC-Norfolk cohort.

Annalijn I Conklin, Nita G Forouhi, Marc Suhrcke, Paul Surtees, Nicholas J Wareham, Pablo Monsivais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Obesity, Employment, and Economic Productivity in Europe: A Systematic Literature Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Does financial hardship associate with abnormal quantitative myocardial perfusion and major adverse cardiovascular event?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Addressing Obesity to Promote Healthy Aging.Clinics in geriatric medicine · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annalijn I Conklin
Nita G Forouhi
Marc Suhrcke
Paul Surtees
Nicholas J Wareham
Pablo MonsivaisUK Clinical Research Collaboration Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Box 296, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK. pm491@medschl.cam.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council MC_U106179471Medical Research Council MC_UP_A100_1003Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/5Medical Research Council MR/K023187/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocioeconomic status is strongly associated with obesity. Current economic circumstances are also independently associated with self-reported weight status in Finnish civil servants. We aimed to examine three types of financial hardship in relation to measured general and central obesity in a general population of older adults, while considering conventional socioeconomic indicators.

methodsData from 10,137 participants (≥50 years) in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort who responded to a postal Health and Life Experiences Questionnaire (1996-2000) and attended a clinical assessment (1998-2002). Multivariable logistic regression models assessed likelihood of general obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) and central obesity (women: ≥88 cm; men: ≥102 cm) calculated from measured anthropometrics.

resultsObesity prevalence was consistently patterned by standard socioeconomic indicators, with over-50s in the lowest social class being twice as likely to be obese than those in the highest class (women OR 2.10 [CI95: 1.41-3.13]; men OR 2.36 [1.44-3.87]). After adjustment for socioeconomic status, reporting having less than enough money for one's needs (compared to more than enough) was associated with obesity in women (OR 2.04 [1.54-2.69]) and men (OR 1.83 [1.34-2.49]). Similar associations were demonstrated between obesity and always or often not having enough money for food/clothing (women OR 1.40 [1.03-1.90]; men OR 1.81 [1.28-2.56]), compared to reporting this never occurred. The strongest independent associations were seen for obesity and reported greatest level of difficulty paying bills (women OR 2.20 [1.37-3.55]; men 2.40 [1.38-4.17]), compared to having no difficulties. Findings for central obesity were slightly higher in women and lower in men.

conclusionsObesity in British over-50s was more likely in study participants who reported greater financial hardship, even after education, social class and home ownership were taken into account. Public health policies need to consider the hitherto neglected role of financial hardship in older people, especially difficulty paying bills, as part of strategies to prevent or reduce obesity.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedObesityPovertyPrevalenceRiskSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24188462
PMCPMC4228357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.