Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24188207›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2014

Development of UK recommendations on treatment for post-surgical erectile dysfunction.

M G Kirby, I D White, J Butcher, B Challacombe, J Coe, L Grover, P Hegarty, G Jackson, A Lowndes, H Payne and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Canadian consensus algorithm for erectile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

M G KirbyThe Prostate Centre, London and the University of Hertfordshire, London, UK.
I D White
J Butcher
B Challacombe
J Coe
L Grover
P Hegarty
G Jackson
A Lowndes
H Payne
J Rees
V Sangar
A Thompson
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBDorset County Hospital · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBLondon Bridge Hospital · GBThe Prostate Centre · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop a management strategy (rehabilitation programme) for postsurgical erectile dysfunction (ED) among men experiencing ED associated with treatment of prostate, bladder or rectal cancer that is suitable for use in a UK NHS healthcare context.

methodsPubMed literature searches of ED management together with a survey of 13 experts in the management of ED from across the UK were conducted.

resultsData from 37 articles and completed questionnaires were collated. The results discussed in this study demonstrate improved objective and subjective clinical outcomes for physical parameters, sexual satisfaction, and rates of both spontaneous erections and those associated with ED treatment strategies.

conclusionBased on the literature and survey analysis, recommendations are proposed for the standardisation of management strategies employed for postsurgical ED.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyErectile DysfunctionHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicProstatic NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsUnited KingdomUrinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24188207
PMCPMC4279873
OpenAlexW2046713483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.