Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24188096›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2013

G6PD testing in support of treatment and elimination of malaria: recommendations for evaluation of G6PD tests.

Gonzalo J Domingo, Ari Winasti Satyagraha, Anup Anvikar, Kevin Baird, Germana Bancone, Pooja Bansil, Nick Carter, Qin Cheng, Janice Culpepper, Chi Eziefula and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. No G6PD A- (G202A) variant detected amongMalariaWorld journal · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 16 institutions in 11 countries.

Gonzalo J DomingoPATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA. gdomingo@path.org.
Ari Winasti Satyagraha
Anup Anvikar
Kevin Baird
Germana Bancone
Pooja Bansil
Nick Carter
Qin Cheng
Janice Culpepper
Chi Eziefula
Mark Fukuda
Justin Green
Jimee Hwang
Marcus Lacerda
Sarah McGray
Didier Menard
Francois Nosten
Issarang Nuchprayoon
Nwe Nwe Oo
Pongwit Bualombai
Wadchara Pumpradit
Kun Qian
Judith Recht
Arantxa Roca
Wichai Satimai
Siv Sovannaroth
Lasse S Vestergaard
Lorenz Von Seidlein
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health · USCambodia National Malaria Center · KHEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology · IDGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBMinistry of Public Health · THShoklo Malaria Research Unit · THBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USChulalongkorn University · THInstitut Pasteur du Cambodge · KHLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMenzies School of Health Research · AUMyanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit · MMNational Institute of Malaria Research · INUniversidade do Estado do Amazonas · BRUniversity of California, San Francisco · USWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific · PH

Funding

Wellcome Trust 089275Wellcome Trust 100714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria elimination will be possible only with serious attempts to address asymptomatic infection and chronic infection by both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. Currently available drugs that can completely clear a human of P. vivax (known as "radical cure"), and that can reduce transmission of malaria parasites, are those in the 8-aminoquinoline drug family, such as primaquine. Unfortunately, people with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency risk having severe adverse reactions if exposed to these drugs at certain doses. G6PD deficiency is the most common human enzyme defect, affecting approximately 400 million people worldwide.Scaling up radical cure regimens will require testing for G6PD deficiency, at two levels: 1) the individual level to ensure safe case management, and 2) the population level to understand the risk in the local population to guide Plasmodium vivax treatment policy. Several technical and operational knowledge gaps must be addressed to expand access to G6PD deficiency testing and to ensure that a patient's G6PD status is known before deciding to administer an 8-aminoquinoline-based drug.In this report from a stakeholder meeting held in Thailand on October 4 and 5, 2012, G6PD testing in support of radical cure is discussed in detail. The focus is on challenges to the development and evaluation of G6PD diagnostic tests, and on challenges related to the operational aspects of implementing G6PD testing in support of radical cure. The report also describes recommendations for evaluation of diagnostic tests for G6PD deficiency in support of radical cure.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleGlucosephosphate Dehydrogenase DeficiencyHumansMalaria, FalciparumMalaria, VivaxMaleMass ScreeningPlasmodium falciparumPlasmodium vivaxThailandAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID24188096
PMCPMC3830439
OpenAlexW2165752279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.