ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2013
Physical principles for scalable neural recording.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
116 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient and reproducible pipelines for spike sorting large-scale electrophysiology data.eLife · 2026Article
- Large-scale electrophysiology at single-spike resolution.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Ionic-Bionic Interfaces: Advancing Iontronic Strategies for Bioelectronic Sensing and Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Multi-Level Perception Systems in Fusion of Lifeforms: Classification, Challenges and Future Conceptions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Microfluidic platform for understanding Parkinson's disease and α-synuclein conformation.Translational neurodegeneration · 2025Review
- A wireless subdural-contained brain-computer interface with 65,536 electrodes and 1,024 channels.Nature electronics · 2025Article
- Iris 128x: open-source 128 channel headstages for neural stimulation and recording.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Capturing the Electrical Activity of all Cortical Neurons: Are Solutions Within Reach?Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Real-time, neural signal processing for high-density brain-implantable devices.Bioelectronic medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Stable, chronic in-vivo recordings from a fully wireless subdural-contained 65,536-electrode brain-computer interface device.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Post-translational digital data encoding into the genomes of mammalian cell populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Implanted cortical neuroprosthetics for speech and movement restoration.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Planar amorphous silicon carbide microelectrode arrays for chronic recording in rat motor cortex.Biomaterials · 2024Article
- A 1024-Channel 268 nW/pixel 36×36IEEE journal of solid-state circuits · 2024Article
- Inference of network connectivity from temporally binned spike trains.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2024Article
- Flexible switch matrix addressable electrode arrays with organic electrochemical transistor and pn diode technology.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Biochemically functionalized probes for cell-type-specific targeting and recording in the brain.Science advances · 2023Article
- Bioadhesive polymer semiconductors and transistors for intimate biointerfaces.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Ultraflexible endovascular probes for brain recording through micrometer-scale vasculature.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Simultaneously measuring the activities of all neurons in a mammalian brain at millisecond resolution is a challenge beyond the limits of existing techniques in neuroscience. Entirely new approaches may be required, motivating an analysis of the fundamental physical constraints on the problem. We outline the physical principles governing brain activity mapping using optical, electrical, magnetic resonance, and molecular modalities of neural recording. Focusing on the mouse brain, we analyze the scalability of each method, concentrating on the limitations imposed by spatiotemporal resolution, energy dissipation, and volume displacement. Based on this analysis, all existing approaches require orders of magnitude improvement in key parameters. Electrical recording is limited by the low multiplexing capacity of electrodes and their lack of intrinsic spatial resolution, optical methods are constrained by the scattering of visible light in brain tissue, magnetic resonance is hindered by the diffusion and relaxation timescales of water protons, and the implementation of molecular recording is complicated by the stochastic kinetics of enzymes. Understanding the physical limits of brain activity mapping may provide insight into opportunities for novel solutions. For example, unconventional methods for delivering electrodes may enable unprecedented numbers of recording sites, embedded optical devices could allow optical detectors to be placed within a few scattering lengths of the measured neurons, and new classes of molecularly engineered sensors might obviate cumbersome hardware architectures. We also study the physics of powering and communicating with microscale devices embedded in brain tissue and find that, while radio-frequency electromagnetic data transmission suffers from a severe power-bandwidth tradeoff, communication via infrared light or ultrasound may allow high data rates due to the possibility of spatial multiplexing. The use of embedded local recording and wireless data transmission would only be viable, however, given major improvements to the power efficiency of microelectronic devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.