Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24187452›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Risk of ileal pouch neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Masahiro Tajika, Yasumasa Niwa, Vikram Bhatia, Tsutomu Tanaka, Makoto Ishihara, Kenji Yamao

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07726771 (ENDOPOL), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07726771 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

ENDOPOL: Dye chromoENDOscopy Versus Virtual Chromoendoscopy for Assessment of the Ileo-anal Pouch in Patients With Familial Adenomatous POLyposis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon North West Healthcare NHS TrustRan2026 to 2031Enrolled50ConditionsFamilial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), Pouches, IleoanalArmsChromoendoscopy (Indigo Carmine), Virtual Chromoendoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pouch cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis. Incidence, risk factors and literature review: a propos of three rare cases.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Don't Forget about the K-Pouch!Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Adenomatous Polyposis Syndromes: Diagnosis and Management.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Adenocarcinoma of the ileal pouch mucosa: case report and literature review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Masahiro TajikaMasahiro Tajika, Yasumasa Niwa, Tsutomu Tanaka, Makoto Ishihara, Department of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan.
Yasumasa Niwa
Vikram Bhatia
Tsutomu Tanaka
Makoto Ishihara
Kenji Yamao
Aichi Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restorative proctocolectomy is the most common surgical option for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). However, adenomas may develop in the ileal pouch mucosa over time, and even carcinoma in the pouch has been reported. We therefore reviewed the prevalence, nature, and treatment of adenomas and carcinoma that develop after proctocolectomy in the ileal pouch mucosa in patients with FAP. In 25 reports that were reviewed, the incidence of adenomas in the ileal pouch varied from 6.7% to 73.9%. Several potential factors that favor the development of pouch polyposis have been investigated, but many remain controversial. Nevertheless, it seems certain that the age of the pouch is important. The risk appears to be 7% to 16% after 5 years, 35% to 42% after 10 years, and 75% after 15 years. On the other hand, only 21 cases of ileal pouch carcinoma have been recorded in the literature to date. The diagnosis of pouch carcinoma was made between 3 to 20 years (median, 10 years) after pouch construction. Although the risk of malignant transformation in ileal pouches is probably low, it is not negligible, and the long-term risk cannot presently be well quantified. Regular endoscopic surveillance, especially using chromoendoscopy, is recommended.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenomaAdenomatous Polyposis ColiAnus NeoplasmsCell Transformation, NeoplasticColonic PouchesHumansIleal NeoplasmsIncidenceIntestinal MucosaPrevalenceRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAdenocarcinomaAdenomaFamilial adenomatous polyposisIleal pouchIleal pouch-anal anastomosisIleo-rectal anastomosisPouch neoplasmPouch polypRestorative proctocolectomy

Identifiers

PMID24187452
PMCPMC3812476
OpenAlexW2153741661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.