Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24186700›Full record

Observational studyPrimary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group2013

Clinical and cost effectiveness of switching asthma patients from fluticasone-salmeterol to extra-fine particle beclometasone-formoterol: a retrospective matched observational study of real-world patients.

David Price, Iain Small, John Haughney, Dermot Ryan, Kevin Gruffydd-Jones, Federico Lavorini, Tim Harris, Annie Burden, Jeremy Brockman, Christine King and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Economic Evaluations Informed Exclusively by Real World Data: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Systematic Literature Review of Systemic Corticosteroid Use for Asthma Management.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Use of ICS/LABA (extra-fine and non-extra-fine) in elderly asthmatics.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2016
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Severe asthma in children.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

David PriceAcademic Centre of Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, UK • Research in Real Life Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Iain Small
John Haughney
Dermot Ryan
Kevin Gruffydd-Jones
Federico Lavorini
Tim Harris
Annie Burden
Jeremy Brockman
Christine King
Alberto Papi
University of Aberdeen · GBAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITChiesi (United Kingdom) · GBNHS Grampian · GBUniversity of Ferrara · ITWiltshire College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfficacy trials suggest that extra-fine particle beclometasone dipropionate-formoterol (efBDP-FOR) is comparable to fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (FP-SAL) in preventing asthma exacerbations at a clinically equivalent dosage. However, switching from FP-SAL to efBDP-FOR has not been evaluated in real-world asthma patients.

aimsThe REACH (Real-world Effectiveness in Asthma therapy of Combination inHalers) study investigated the clinical and cost effectiveness of switching typical asthma patients from FP-SAL to efBDP-FOR.

methodsA retrospective matched (1:3) observational study of 1,528 asthma patients aged 18-80 years from clinical practice databases was performed. Patients remaining on FP-SAL (n=1,146) were compared with those switched to efBDP-FOR at an equivalent or lower inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dosage (n=382). Clinical and economic outcomes were compared between groups for the year before and after the switch. Non-inferiority (at least equivalence) of efBDP-FOR was tested against FP-SAL by comparing exacerbation rates during the outcome year.

resultsefBDP-FOR was non-inferior to FP-SAL (adjusted exacerbation rate ratio 1.01 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.37)). Switching to efBDP-FOR resulted in significantly better (p<0.05) odds of achieving overall asthma control (no asthma-related hospitalisations, bronchial infections, or acute oral steroids; salbutamol ≤200μg/day) and lower daily short-acting β2-agonist usage at a lower daily ICS dosage (mean -130μg/day FP equivalents; p<0.001). It also reduced mean asthma-related healthcare costs by £93.63/patient/year (p<0.001).

conclusionsAsthma patients may be switched from FP-SAL to efBDP-FOR at an equivalent or lower ICS dosage with no reduction in clinical effectiveness but a significant reduction in cost.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlbuterolAndrostadienesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaBeclomethasoneCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug CombinationsDrug CostsDrug SubstitutionEthanolaminesFemaleAlbuterolAndrostadienesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBeclomethasoneDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluticasone-Salmeterol Drug CombinationFormoterol Fumarate

Identifiers

PMID24186700
PMCPMC6443103
OpenAlexW2098805411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.