Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24186668›Full record

ArticlePlanta1992

Whole-cell K(+) current across the plasma membrane of guard cells from a grass: Zea mays.

K A Fairley-Grenot, S M Assmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K A Fairley-GrenotBiological Laboratories, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA.
S M Assmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of ion fluxes in the dumbell-shaped guard cells of grass species has been limited by the difficulty of obtaining isolated epidermes or guard-cell protoplasts for use in radioactive-tracer or electrophysiological studies. We describe here a method for isolating guard-cell protoplasts from Zea mays L. Whole-cell patch clamp has been used to measure K(+)-channel current across the plasma membrane surrounding these protoplasts. Two populations of K(+)-permeable channels have been identified. Hyperpolarization of the membrane to potentials (Vm) more negative than -100 mV results in inward K(+) current through one population of channels. Inward current activation is faster than in the dicotyledon, Vicia faba L. (mean activation half-time 26 ms (Z. mays) versus 123 ms (V. faba) at Vm=-180 mV). Steady-state current density is less than in V. faba (-22 μA · cm(-2) (Z. mays) versus -40 μA · cm(-2) (V. faba) at Vm=- 180 mV in 12 mM external K(+)). Depolarization of the membrane to potentials more positive than -20 mV results in outward K(+) current through a second population of channels; these channels activate and (upon repolarization of the membrane) deactivate more slowly than in V. faba (mean activation half-time 375 ms (Z. mays) versus 187 ms (V. faba) at Vm=+ 80 mV) but result in a similar steady-state current density (23.8 μA · cm(-2) (Z. mays) versus 28.7 μA · cm(-2) (V. faba) at Vm= + 80 mV with 105 mM internal K(+)). Omission of K(+) eliminates the current. The K(+) current is sensitive to both internal and external Ca(2+) concentration: increasing internal Ca(2+) from 2 nM to 0.2 μM or increasing external Ca(2+) from 1 mM to 8.5 mM reduces the magnitude of both inward and outward current.

Identifiers

PMID24186668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.