ArticleJournal of dental research2014
Adhesion forces and composition of planktonic and adhering oral microbiomes.
Article in Journal of dental research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determination of streptococcus mutans retention in acidic and neutral pH artificial saliva environment of all-ceramic materials with different surface treatment.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Characterization and morphological methods for oral biofilm visualization: where are we nowadays?AIMS microbiology · 2024Review
- Adhesion Forces of Oral Bacteria to Titanium and the Correlation with Biophysical Cellular Characteristics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effect of staining on the mechanical, surface and biological properties of lithium disilicate.The Saudi dental journal · 2022Article
- Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) As a Surface Mapping Tool in Microorganisms Resistant Toward Antimicrobials: A Mini-Review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Scanning electron microscopy approach to observe bacterial adhesion to dental surfaces.MethodsX · 2020Article
- Microbial adhesion on novel yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) implant surfaces with nitrogen-doped hydrogenated amorphous carbon (a-C:H:N) coatings.Clinical oral investigations · 2016Article
- Binding Force Dynamics of Streptococcus mutans-glucosyltransferase B to Candida albicans.Journal of dental research · 2015Article
- In vivo biofilm formation on stainless steel bonded retainers during different oral health-care regimens.International journal of oral science · 2015Article
- Nanotechnology in dentistry: prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2015Review
- The Oral Bacterial Communities of Children with Well-Controlled HIV Infection and without HIV Infection.PloS one · 2015Article
- Nanoscale adhesion forces between enamel pellicle proteins and hydroxyapatite.Journal of dental research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The oral microbiome consists of a planktonic microbiome residing in saliva and an adhering microbiome (the biofilm adhering to oral hard and soft tissues). Here we hypothesized that possible differences in microbial composition of the planktonic and adhering oral microbiome on teeth can be related to the forces by which different bacterial species are attracted to the tooth surface. The relative presence of 7 oral bacterial species in saliva and biofilm collected from 10 healthy human volunteers was determined twice in each volunteer by denaturing-gradient-gel electrophoresis. Analysis of both microbiomes showed complete separation of the planktonic from the adhering oral microbiome. Next, adhesion forces of corresponding bacterial strains with saliva-coated enamel surfaces were measured by atomic force microscopy. Species that were found predominantly in the adhering microbiome had significantly higher adhesion forces to saliva-coated enamel (-0.60 to -1.05 nN) than did species mostly present in the planktonic microbiome (-0.40 to -0.55 nN). It is concluded that differences in composition of the planktonic and the adhering oral microbiome are due to small differences in the forces by which strains adhere to saliva-coated enamel, providing an important step in understanding site- and material-specific differences in the composition of biofilms in the oral cavity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.