Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24186078›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2014

Neural responses to subliminally presented cannabis and other emotionally evocative cues in cannabis-dependent individuals.

Reagan R Wetherill, Anna Rose Childress, Kanchana Jagannathan, Julian Bender, Kimberly A Young, Jesse J Suh, Charles P O'Brien, Teresa R Franklin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Nonacute effects of cannabis use on motivation and reward sensitivity in humans: A systematic review.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Inhalation of Alcohol Vapor: Measurement and Implications.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Nipping cue reactivity in the bud: baclofen prevents limbic activation elicited by subliminal drug cues.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Reagan R WetherillDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, 3900 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA, rweth@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Anna Rose Childress
Kanchana Jagannathan
Julian Bender
Kimberly A Young
Jesse J Suh
Charles P O'Brien
Teresa R Franklin
Chestnut Hill College · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · US

Funding

TREATMENT STRATEGIES FOR METHODONE NONRESPONDERSP60DA005186 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI O'BRIEN, CHARLES P · 1997 to 2012
$28.1M
GABA B agonists revisited: Brain, behavioral and genetic effects in smokersR01DA030394 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FRANKLIN, TERESA R · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Characterizing a cue-vulnerable pharmaco-responsive endophenotype in smokersR01DA029845 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FRANKLIN, TERESA R · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS P60 DA005186NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029845NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAddiction theories posit that drug-related cues maintain and contribute to drug use and relapse. Indeed, our recent study in cocaine-dependent patients demonstrated that subliminally presented cocaine-related stimuli activate reward neurocircuitry without being consciously perceived. Activation of reward neurocircuitry may provoke craving and perhaps prime an individual for subsequent drug-seeking behaviors.

objectivesUsing an equivalent paradigm, we tested whether cannabis cues activate reward neurocircuitry in treatment-seeking, cannabis-dependent individuals and whether activation was associated with relevant behavioral anchors: baseline cannabis craving (drug-seeking behavior) and duration of use (degree of conditioning).

methodsTwenty treatment-seeking, cannabis-dependent individuals (12 males) underwent event-related blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging during exposure to 33-ms cannabis, sexual, and aversive cues presented in a backward-masking paradigm. Drug use history and cannabis craving were assessed prior to imaging.

resultsParticipants showed increased activity to backward-masked cannabis cues in regions supporting reward detection and interoception, including the left anterior insula, left ventral striatum/amygdala, and right ventral striatum. Cannabis cue-related activity in the bilateral insula and perigenual anterior cingulate cortex was positively associated with baseline cannabis craving, and cannabis cue-related activity in the medial orbitofrontal cortex was positively correlated with years of cannabis use. Neural responses to backward-masked sexual cues were similar to those observed during cannabis cue exposure, while activation to aversive cues was observed only in the left anterior insula and perigenual anterior cingulate cortex.

conclusionsThese data highlight the sensitivity of the brain to subliminal reward signals and support hypotheses promoting a common pathway of appetitive motivation.

Indexed as

Subliminal StimulationAdultBehavior, AddictiveBrainBrain MappingCuesEmotionsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMarijuana AbusePhotic StimulationRewardYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24186078
PMCPMC6218642
OpenAlexW2063447316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.