SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Association between Cyclin D1 polymorphism and oral cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aberrant Cyclin D1 splicing in cancer: from molecular mechanism to therapeutic modulation.Cell death & disease · 2023Review
- Article
- Evaluation of the Role Played by Cyclin D1 as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker in the Progression of Oral Carcinogenesis.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2018Article
- Novel polymorphism in FADS1 gene and fish consumption on risk of oral cancer: A case-control study in southeast China.Oncotarget · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data from several case-control studies on the relation between the Cyclin D1 (CCND1) G870A polymorphism and oral cancer susceptibility implicated conflicting conclusions. Thus, a meta-analysis was performed to derive a more precise evaluation of the association. We searched PubMed and Embase for related studies that had been published in English and eight available studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. Odd ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each study. Our meta-analysis suggested that CCND1 G870A polymorphism was not associated with oral cancer risk (OR AA vs. GG = 1.08, 95 % CI = 0.90-1.30, P heterogeneity = 0.175; OR AA + GA vs. GG = 1.02, 95 % CI = 0.91-1.14, P heterogeneity = 0.781; OR AA vs. GA + GG = 1.16, 95 % CI = 0.98-1.36, P heterogeneity = 0.107; OR A vs. G = 1.05 95 % CI = 0.96-1.15, P heterogeneity = 0.211; OR GA vs. GG = 0.94, 95 % CI = 0.82-1.08, P heterogeneity = 0.935). However, in the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, possible significance among Asian groups was indicated in two genetic models (OR AA vs. GA + GG = 1.27, 95 % CI = 1.05-1.54, P heterogeneity = 0.572; OR allele A vs. allele G = 1.11, 95 % CI = 1.00-1.24, P heterogeneity = 0.211). Taken together, the meta-analysis revealed that CCND1 G870A polymorphism might be correlated with the susceptibility of oral cancer in Asians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.