ArticlePlant cell reports1995
Sequence comparison of two codominant RAPD markers in Brassica nigra: deletions, substitutions and microsatellites.
Article in Plant cell reports, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plastid genome characterisation in Brassica and Brassicaceae using a new set of nine SSRs.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two RAPD fragments segregating codominantly were investigated in a F2 population of Brassica nigra. Southern hybridization of these DNA fragments to genomic B. nigra DNA digested with several endonucleases revealed similar restriction profiles. Sequencing of the two fragments disclosed 93% homology. The differences were due mainly to an internal 41 nucleotide deletion in one of the fragments. Minor deletions of one to three bases, including a microsatellite of CTT motif were also observed. In addition, base substitutions, mostly transitions were detected. These relatively small differences suggested that the two RAPD products were indeed different versions of the same sequence. The larger fragment of 1154 bp was denominated A05(1) whereas the shorter one, denominated A05(2), had 1116 bp.
Identifiers
24185789What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.