Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24185589›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2014

Effects of storage temperature on hematopoietic stability and microbial safety of BM aspirates.

S Hahn, W Sireis, K Hourfar, D Karpova, K Dauber, V A J Kempf, E Seifried, M Schmidt, H Bönig

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S HahnGerman Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
W SireisGerman Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
K HourfarGerman Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
D KarpovaGerman Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
K DauberGerman Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
V A J KempfInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
E SeifriedGerman Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
M SchmidtGerman Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
H Bönig1] German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany [2] Department of Medicine/Hematology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEGerman Red Cross · DEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow (BM) remains a common source for hematopoietic SCT. Due to the transcutaneous approach, contamination with skin bacteria is common. The delay between harvest and transfusion can be considerable, potentially allowing for bacterial proliferation. The optimal transportation temperature, specifically with respect to bacterial growth and consequences thereof for hematopoietic quality, remain undefined. For 72 h, 66 individual BM samples, non-spiked/spiked with different bacteria, stored at 20-24 °C room temperature (RT) or 3-5 °C (cold), were serially analyzed for hematopoietic quality and microbial burden. Under most conditions, hematopoietic quality of BM was equal or better at RT: Typical BM contaminants (P. acnes and S. epidermidis) and E. coli were killed or bacterial proliferation was arrested at RT; hematopoietic quality was not impacted by the contamination. However, several pathogenic bacteria not typically found in BM (S. aureus and K. pneumoniae) proliferated dramatically at RT and impaired hematopoietic quality. Bacterial proliferation was arrested in the cold. The overwhelming majority of BM samples, that is, those that are sterile or contaminated only with skin commensals, will benefit from transportation at RT. Those bacteria that proliferate and perturb hematopoietic quality are not typically found in BM. Our data support recommendations for RT transportation and storage of BM.

Indexed as

TemperatureAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone MarrowEscherichia coliHematopoiesisHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaePropionibacterium acnesSkinSpecimen HandlingStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisStem CellsTime FactorsTissue PreservationAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID24185589
OpenAlexW1972618520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.