Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24184964›Full record

ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2014

Bayesian peak picking for NMR spectra.

Yichen Cheng, Xin Gao, Faming Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. iPick: Multiprocessing software for integrated NMR signal detection and validation.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. INFOS: spectrum fitting software for NMR analysis.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yichen ChengDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Xin GaoComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Faming LiangDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Electronic address: fliang@stat.tamu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein structure determination is a very important topic in structural genomics, which helps people to understand varieties of biological functions such as protein-protein interactions, protein-DNA interactions and so on. Nowadays, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has often been used to determine the three-dimensional structures of protein in vivo. This study aims to automate the peak picking step, the most important and tricky step in NMR structure determination. We propose to model the NMR spectrum by a mixture of bivariate Gaussian densities and use the stochastic approximation Monte Carlo algorithm as the computational tool to solve the problem. Under the Bayesian framework, the peak picking problem is casted as a variable selection problem. The proposed method can automatically distinguish true peaks from false ones without preprocessing the data. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first effort in the literature that tackles the peak picking problem for NMR spectrum data using Bayesian method.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyAlgorithmsAutomationBayes TheoremMonte Carlo MethodProteinsSoftwareProteinsMarkov chain Monte CarloNuclear magnetic resonancePeak picking

Identifiers

PMID24184964
PMCPMC4411369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.