Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24184944›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in lipidology2013

Estrogens and cardiovascular disease risk revisited: the Women's Health Initiative.

Barbara V Howard, Jacques E Rossouw

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in lipidology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Current strategies for quantification of estrogens in clinical research.The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara V HowardaMedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland bGeorgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Washington, District of Columbia cNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jacques E Rossouw
MedStar Health · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · US

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100046CNIA NIH HHS HHSN271201100004CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn 2002 and 2004, the Women's Health Initiative found no evidence that hormone therapy with estrogen or estrogen with progestin (E + P) protected against cardiovascular disease (CVD). Since then, further analyses have been performed. This review summarizes current analyses on the effects of hormone therapy on CVD and CVD risk factors. RECENT

findingsThe negative effects of hormone therapy vary by the type of CVD event. Estrogen alone and E + P show consistent effects on CVD, but E + P has more impact on coronary heart disease (CHD) and venous thromboembolism. Women of all ethnicities, including those who are obese, have diabetes, or are taking daily aspirin or statins remain at risk for adverse effects from hormone therapy. Although younger women or more recently menopausal women taking hormone therapy may be at relatively lower risk for CHD and myocardial infarction, they remain at risk for stroke, venous thromboembolism and peripheral artery disease. Adverse effects are enhanced in older women with menopausal symptoms. Although hormone therapy lowers LDL cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) and raises high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, it has adverse effects on triglyceride, lipoprotein composition, and inflammatory and hemostatic markers. Baseline metabolic syndrome and high LDL cholesterol increase the CHD risk with hormone therapy. Analyses of discontinuation data in the estrogen-alone and E + P trials suggest that the adverse effects of hormone therapy on CVD are reversible. SUMMARY: Recent analyses do not justify postmenopausal hormone therapy for CVD prevention. Further research on the role of hormone therapy-induced changes in CVD risk factors along with genetic studies may increase understanding and aid in developing safer therapies for menopausal symptoms.

Indexed as

HealthAnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesDrug CombinationsEstrogensFemaleHormone Replacement TherapyHumansRiskDrug CombinationsEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID24184944
PMCPMC4219554
OpenAlexW2029955124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.