Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24184936›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2014

Evolutionary conservation of long non-coding RNAs; sequence, structure, function.

Per Johnsson, Leonard Lipovich, Dan Grandér, Kevin V Morris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 415 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
415citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

415 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Role of Chromatin-Associated RNAs in Eye Physiology and Pathology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  2. The dark genome in cardiovascular medicine.European heart journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Global deletion ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. LncRNA-CFTBS enhancesVirulence · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

355 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Per JohnssonDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Leonard LipovichCenter for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA; Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detriot, MI, USA.
Dan GrandérDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kevin V MorrisSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: kmorris@unsw.edu.au.

Funding

Targeted Delivery Vechicles for OligonucleotidesP01AI099783 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI AKKINA, RAMESH · 2012 to 2016
$7.4M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI099783NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI099783-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in genomewide studies have revealed the abundance of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in mammalian transcriptomes. The ENCODE Consortium has elucidated the prevalence of human lncRNA genes, which are as numerous as protein-coding genes. Surprisingly, many lncRNAs do not show the same pattern of high interspecies conservation as protein-coding genes. The absence of functional studies and the frequent lack of sequence conservation therefore make functional interpretation of these newly discovered transcripts challenging. Many investigators have suggested the presence and importance of secondary structural elements within lncRNAs, but mammalian lncRNA secondary structure remains poorly understood. It is intriguing to speculate that in this group of genes, RNA secondary structures might be preserved throughout evolution and that this might explain the lack of sequence conservation among many lncRNAs. SCOPE OF REVIEW: Here, we review the extent of interspecies conservation among different lncRNAs, with a focus on a subset of lncRNAs that have been functionally investigated. The function of lncRNAs is widespread and we investigate whether different forms of functionalities may be conserved. MAJOR

conclusionsLack of conservation does not imbue a lack of function. We highlight several examples of lncRNAs where RNA structure appears to be the main functional unit and evolutionary constraint. We survey existing genomewide studies of mammalian lncRNA conservation and summarize their limitations. We further review specific human lncRNAs which lack evolutionary conservation beyond primates but have proven to be both functional and therapeutically relevant. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Pioneering studies highlight a role in lncRNAs for secondary structures, and possibly the presence of functional "modules", which are interspersed with longer and less conserved stretches of nucleotide sequences. Taken together, high-throughput analysis of conservation and functional composition of the still-mysterious lncRNA genes is only now becoming feasible.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsConserved SequenceHumansRNA, AntisenseRNA, Long NoncodingGAS5 long non-coding RNA, humanMALAT1 long non-coding RNA, humanRNA, AntisenseRNA, Long Noncodingsteroid receptor RNA activatorAntisense RNAEpigeneticEvolutionLong non-coding RNAPolypurinesSecondary structure

Identifiers

PMID24184936
PMCPMC3909678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.