Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24183415›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

What factors explain disparities in mammography rates among Asian-American immigrant women? A population-based study in California.

So Yeon Ryu, Catherine M Crespi, Annette E Maxwell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Non-normal Screening Mammography Results, Lumpectomies, and Breast Cancer Reported by California Women, 2001-2009.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

So Yeon RyuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Chosun University Medical School, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Korea.
Catherine M Crespi
Annette E Maxwell
University of California, Los Angeles · USChosun University · KR

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
Supporting African American Churches to Promote Cancer ScreeningU54CA143931 · NCI · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED & SCI · PI VADGAMA, JAYDUTT V. · 2009 to 2022
$19.7M
UCLA/RAND PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTERU48DP001934 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BASTANI, ROSHAN · 2009 to 2013
$5.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001934NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48DP001934NCI NIH HHS CA16042NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare rates of screening mammography among immigrant women in five Asian-American ethnic groups in California, and ascertain the extent to which differences in mammography rates among these groups are attributable to differences in known correlates of cancer screening.

methodsUsing 2009 data from the California Health Interview Survey, we compared the rates of mammography among Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese immigrants 40 years and older. To assess the impact of Asian ethnicity on participation in screening, we performed multiple logistic regression analysis with models that progressively adjusted for acculturation, sociodemographic characteristics, access to health care, and breast cancer risk factors, and examined the predicted probabilities of screening after adjusting for these factors.

findingsParticipation in screening mammography differed according to ethnicity, with Filipina and Vietnamese Americans having the highest rates and Korean Americans having the lowest rates of lifetime and recent (past 2 years) screening. These differences decreased substantially after adjusting for acculturation, sociodemographic factors, and risk factors of breast cancer, but differences remained, most notably for Korean Americans, who continued to have the lowest predicted probability of screening even after adjustment for these factors.

conclusionsThis analysis draws attention to low mammography screening rates among Asian-American immigrants, especially recent immigrants who lack health insurance. Given that their breast cancer incidence is rising with length of stay in the United States, it is important to increase regular mammography screening in these groups.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesAcculturationAgedAged, 80 and overAsianBreast NeoplasmsCaliforniaEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansIncidenceInterviews as TopicLogistic ModelsMammographyMass Screening

Identifiers

PMID24183415
PMCPMC3833860
OpenAlexW2004999342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.