Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24183027›Full record

ReviewNeuron2013

Cartography and connectomes.

David C Van Essen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Unsupervised pattern identification in spatial gene expression atlas reveals mouse brain regions beyond established ontology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Greedy low-rank algorithm for spatial connectome regression.Journal of mathematical neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. CHARTING DEVELOPMENT-BASED JOINT PARCELLATION MAPS OF HUMAN AND MACAQUE BRAINS DURING INFANCY.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2019
    Article
  20. A Brief History of Simulation Neuroscience.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David C Van EssenAnatomy and Neurobiology Department, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: vanessen@wustl.edu.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
RECONSTRUCTIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF CEREBRAL CORTEXR01MH060974 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 1999 to 2024
$12.7M
NIMH NIH HHS 1U54MH091657NIMH NIH HHS MH60974NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060974NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past 25 years have seen great progress in parcellating the cerebral cortex into a mosaic of many distinct areas in mice, monkeys, and humans. Quantitative studies of interareal connectivity have revealed unexpectedly many pathways and a wide range of connection strengths in mouse and macaque cortex. In humans, advances in analyzing "structural" and "functional" connectivity using powerful but indirect noninvasive neuroimaging methods are yielding intriguing insights about brain circuits, their variability across individuals, and their relationship to behavior.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBrain MappingConnectomeAnimalsBrainHumansModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID24183027
PMCPMC3855872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.