Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24183021›Full record

ArticleNeuron2013

AMPARs and synaptic plasticity: the last 25 years.

Richard L Huganir, Roger A Nicoll

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 599 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
599citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

599 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Glutamatergic Modulation of Brain Function in Psychosis: A Systematic Review of Neuroimaging Studies.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Functional CaScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

539 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Richard L HuganirSolomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: rhuganir@jhmi.edu.
Roger A Nicoll

Funding

Synaptic Plasticity Regulated by Stargazin-like gamma-8R01MH070957 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NICOLL, ROGER A · 2004 to 2019
$6.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of synaptic plasticity and specifically LTP and LTD is one of the most active areas of research in neuroscience. In the last 25 years we have come a long way in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying synaptic plasticity. In 1988, AMPA and NMDA receptors were not even molecularly identified and we only had a simple model of the minimal requirements for the induction of plasticity. It is now clear that the modulation of the AMPA receptor function and membrane trafficking is critical for many forms of synaptic plasticity and a large number of proteins have been identified that regulate this complex process. Here we review the progress over the last two and a half decades and discuss the future challenges in the field.

Indexed as

AnimalsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyNeuronal PlasticityNeurosciencesReceptors, AMPASynapsesReceptors, AMPA

Identifiers

PMID24183021
PMCPMC4195488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.