Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24182612›Full record

ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology2013

Cost-effectiveness of screening and treating Helicobacter pylori for gastric cancer prevention.

Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Linda Sharp

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03231332 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Long Term Effects of H.Pylori Eradication on Microbiome and Adverse Events

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LatviaRan2017 to 2025Enrolled900ConditionsHuman MicrobiomeArmsMicrobiome Diversity detection
NCT06216639 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

EU4Health Project Eurohelican: A Single-center Prospective Feasibility Study of the Proposed Test-and-treat Preventive Screening Program in Younger Slovenian Participants Aged 30-34 Years With or Without Helicobacter Pylori Infection

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Public Health, SloveniaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled2,000ConditionsHelicobacter Pylori InfectionArmsBismuth Subcitrate, Esomeprazole, Metronidazole, Amoxicillin, Clarithromycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Social determinants of health andFrontiers in public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prevalence ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. From screening to surveillance: integrated prevention ofThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Current status ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Iris Lansdorp-VogelaarDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: i.vogelaar@erasmusmc.nl.
Linda Sharp
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLNational Cancer Registry · IE

Funding

Modeling Effective Health Policies for Colorectal CancerU01CA152959 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI KUNTZ, KAREN M, LANSDORP-VOGELAAR, IRIS · 2010 to 2014
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152959NCI NIH HHS U01-CA-152959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. A meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials concluded that Helicobacter pylori eradication reduces gastric cancer incidence by 35%. Current consensus is that H. pylori screening and treatment is cost-effective only in high-risk populations. This paper provides an up-to-date overview of the evidence for cost-effectiveness of H. pylori screening and treatment in different population settings and risk levels for H. pylori infection. Ten unique cost-effectiveness or cost-utility analyses were identified. All found that screening for H. pylori to prevent gastric cancer in the general population costs less than $50,000 per LYG. This finding was robust for differences in H. pylori prevalence, gender and ethnicity. Based on limited evidence, re-treatment (for treatment failure), repeated screening, limiting screening and treatment to those with the CagA phenotype, or universal treatment, does not appear to be cost-effective. However, most included studies failed to consider both the broader benefits as well as the adverse effects of widespread use of antibiotics for H. pylori.

Indexed as

Helicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriAnti-Bacterial AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansMass ScreeningStomach NeoplasmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCost–benefit analysisEarly detection of cancerHelicobacter pyloriStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24182612
PMCPMC3880867
OpenAlexW2050352446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.