Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24180414›Full record

ArticleACS chemical biology2014

General method for regulating protein stability with light.

Kimberly M Bonger, Rishi Rakhit, Alexander Y Payumo, James K Chen, Thomas J Wandless

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Optogenetic engineering for precision cancer immunotherapy.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The dynamic duo of microtubule polymerase Mini spindles/XMAP215 and cytoplasmic dynein is essential for maintainingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimberly M BongerDepartment of Chemical & Systems Biology, Stanford University , Stanford California, 94305, USA.
Rishi Rakhit
Alexander Y Payumo
James K Chen
Thomas J Wandless
Stanford University · US

Funding

TRAINING & OUTREACH COREP50GM107615 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FERRELL, JAMES E. · 2013 to 2017
$10.9M
Novel Molecules as In Vivo Biological ProbesR01GM073046 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WANDLESS, THOMAS JAMES · 2006 to 2017
$3.6M
Chemical Embryology: Technologies for Manipulating and Visualizing DevelopmentDP1HD075622 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, JAMES K · 2012 to 2012
$792k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP1 HD075622NICHD NIH HHS DP1 HD075622NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM107615NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-translational regulation of protein abundance in cells is a powerful tool for studying protein function. Here, we describe a novel genetically encoded protein domain that is degraded upon exposure to nontoxic blue light. We demonstrate that fusion proteins containing this domain are rapidly degraded in cultured cells and in zebrafish upon illumination.

Indexed as

PhotolysisProtein StabilityAnimalsAvenaLightLuminescent ProteinsMiceNIH 3T3 CellsPhototropinsProtein EngineeringProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant Fusion ProteinsZebrafishLuminescent ProteinsPhototropinsRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24180414
PMCPMC3906921
OpenAlexW1980552600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.