Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24180357›Full record

SynthesisDiabetes technology & therapeutics2013

Diabetes mellitus increases the risk of bladder cancer: an updated meta-analysis of observational studies.

Hong Fang, Baodong Yao, Yujie Yan, Huilin Xu, Yinan Liu, Hongmei Tang, Jie Zhou, Lili Cao, Weijie Wang, Jinling Zhang and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Sirenic Links between Diabetes, Obesity, and Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hong FangShanghai Minhang Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Shanghai, People's Republic of China .
Baodong Yao
Yujie Yan
Huilin Xu
Yinan Liu
Hongmei Tang
Jie Zhou
Lili Cao
Weijie Wang
Jinling Zhang
Liyun Zhao
Xi Chen
Fen Zhang
Yanping Zhao
Center for Disease Control · TWShanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing evidence suggests that diabetes mellitus (DM) may be associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer. We performed an updated meta-analysis to examine the association between DM and risk of bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe systematically searched the EMBASE and Medline (PubMed) databases (from inception through February 1, 2013) and reviewed the reference lists of relevant publications to search for additional studies. Summary relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with random-effects models.

resultsIn total, 10 case-control and 14 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Analysis of all studies showed that DM was associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.18-1.43). There was heterogeneity among studies (Pheterogeneity <0.001, I(2)=81.5%). Cohort studies showed a lower risk (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.37) than case-control studies (odds ratio 1.46, 95% CI 1.20-1.78). The positive association was significant only in women (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.49), but not in men (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.97-1.18). The combined RRs remained unchanged before and after the studies on type 1 diabetes were excluded from analysis. The association between DM and bladder cancer risk did not differ significantly by methods of DM ascertainment. The combined RRs were 1.17 (95% CI 1.03-1.34), 1.34 (95% CI 1.19-1.51), and 1.57 (95% CI 0.96-2.55), respectively, when restricting the analysis to the studies accounting for body mass index, cigarette smoking, or glucose-lowering drug use.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis indicates a positive association between DM and risk of bladder cancer. Further studies are warranted to determine whether DM prevention and control can reduce risk of bladder cancer.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHyperglycemiaInsulin ResistanceMaleOdds RatioRiskSex FactorsUrinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24180357
PMCPMC3817892
OpenAlexW2026974791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.