Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24179856›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage. Clinical2013

Complex biomarker discovery in neuroimaging data: Finding a needle in a haystack.

Gowtham Atluri, Kanchana Padmanabhan, Gang Fang, Michael Steinbach, Jeffrey R Petrella, Kelvin Lim, Angus Macdonald, Nagiza F Samatova, P Murali Doraiswamy, Vipin Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Neuroimaging in Schizophrenia.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gowtham AtluriDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, USA.
Kanchana Padmanabhan
Gang Fang
Michael Steinbach
Jeffrey R Petrella
Kelvin Lim
Angus Macdonald
Nagiza F Samatova
P Murali Doraiswamy
Vipin Kumar
Twin Cities Orthopedics · USNorth Carolina State University · USDuke Medical Center · USDuke University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

PRECLINICAL STUDIES:ANIMAL MODELS OF IMPULSIVITY AND ADDICTIONP20DA024196 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LIM, KELVIN O. · 2007 to 2010
$3.2M
NIDA NIH HHS P20 DA024196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and Alzheimer's disease are major public health problems. However, despite decades of research, we currently have no validated prognostic or diagnostic tests that can be applied at an individual patient level. Many neuropsychiatric diseases are due to a combination of alterations that occur in a human brain rather than the result of localized lesions. While there is hope that newer imaging technologies such as functional and anatomic connectivity MRI or molecular imaging may offer breakthroughs, the single biomarkers that are discovered using these datasets are limited by their inability to capture the heterogeneity and complexity of most multifactorial brain disorders. Recently, complex biomarkers have been explored to address this limitation using neuroimaging data. In this manuscript we consider the nature of complex biomarkers being investigated in the recent literature and present techniques to find such biomarkers that have been developed in related areas of data mining, statistics, machine learning and bioinformatics.

Identifiers

PMID24179856
PMCPMC3791294
OpenAlexW2019141334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.