Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24179564›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science2012

Recent progress in perceptual learning research.

Yuka Sasaki, José E Náñez, Takeo Watanabe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Time perception: the bad news and the good.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2014
    Review
  16. Two-stage model in perceptual learning: toward a unified theory.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuka SasakiDepartment of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
José E NáñezDivision of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Arizona State University, Glendale, AZ, USA.
Takeo WatanabeDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, University of Boston, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Perceptual Learning and SleepR01MH091801 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SASAKI, YUKA, WATANABE, TAKEO · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual learning is defined as long-term improvement in perceptual or sensory systems resulting from repeated practice or experience. As the number of perceptual learning studies has increased, controversies and questions have arisen regarding divergent aspects of perceptual learning, including: (1) stages in which perceptual learning occurs, (2) effects of training type, (3) changes in neural processing during the time course of learning, (4) effects of feedback as to correctness of a subject's responses, and (5) double training. Here we review each of these aspects and suggest fruitful directions for future perceptual learning research. WIREs Cogn Sci 2012, 3:293-299. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1175 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Identifiers

PMID24179564
PMCPMC3811035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.