Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24179136›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2013

Models for the evolution of GC content in asexual fungi Candida albicans and C. dubliniensis.

Marie-Claude Marsolier-Kergoat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marie-Claude Marsolier-KergoatCEA/CNRS/Univ Paris-Sud, FRE 3377, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although guanine-cytosine (GC)-biased gene conversion (gBGC) following meiotic recombination seems the most probable mechanism accounting for large-scale variations in GC content for many eukaryotes, it cannot explain such variations for organisms belonging to ancient asexual lineages, such as the pathogenic fungi Candida albicans and C. dubliniensis. Analysis of the substitution patterns for these two species reveals a strong anticorrelation between the synonymous transition rates at third codon positions. I propose two models that can account for this observation. According to the first model, the evolution of GC content is driven by gBGC linked to mitotic recombination, either associated with parasexuality or with damage repair. Variations in the GC content thus reflect variations in the strength of gBGC, presumably variations in the mitotic recombination rate. According to the second model, the evolution of GC content is driven by misincorporation errors during the process of DNA replication in S phase. This model proposes that variations in GC content are due to variations in the proportions of dCTPs and dGTPs at the time when sequences are replicated. Experimental data regarding mitotic recombination rates or the variations of dCTPs and dGTPs during S phase are required to validate definitively one of the two models, but in any case, the fit of the models to the data suggests that C. albicans and C. dubliniensis constitute so far unique examples of GC content evolution driven either by mitotic recombination or replicative errors.

Indexed as

Base CompositionEvolution, MolecularGenome, FungalModels, GeneticCandida albicansCodonDNA, FungalDNA RepairDNA ReplicationMitosisRecombination, GeneticCodonDNA, Fungalasexual lineageCandidaGC-biased gene conversionGC contentmitotic recombinationreplication

Identifiers

PMID24179136
PMCPMC3845650
OpenAlexW2096941863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.