Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24178900›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2013

The role of chelation in the treatment of arsenic and mercury poisoning.

Michael J Kosnett

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acrodynia and CASPR2 Autoimmunity in Elemental Mercury Toxicity.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Mercury in Retrograde: The Tale of Toxicity.Case reports in nephrology · 2026
    Article
  6. Arsenome, Arsenobolome, and Arsenobiolome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Toxic effects of chronic occupational mercury vapor exposure on female workers of childbearing age.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Mutagenic, Carcinogenic, and Teratogenic Effect of Heavy Metals.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael J KosnettDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1630 Welton, Suite 300, Denver, CO, 80202, USA, michael.kosnett@ucdenver.edu.
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND TOXICOLOGY: PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION AND PUBLIC HEALTH CONU61TS000117 · TS · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF MEDICAL TOXICOLOGY · PI KOSNETT, MICHAEL J · 2009 to 2013
$587k
ATSDR CDC HHS 1U61TS000117-04ATSDR CDC HHS U61 TS000117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chelation for heavy metal intoxication began more than 70 years ago with the development of British anti-lewisite (BAL; dimercaprol) in wartime Britain as a potential antidote the arsenical warfare agent lewisite (dichloro[2-chlorovinyl]arsine). DMPS (unithiol) and DMSA (succimer), dithiol water-soluble analogs of BAL, were developed in the Soviet Union and China in the late 1950s. These three agents have remained the mainstay of chelation treatment of arsenic and mercury intoxication for more than half a century. Animal experiments and in some instances human data indicate that the dithiol chelators enhance arsenic and mercury excretion. Controlled animal experiments support a therapeutic role for these chelators in the prompt treatment of acute poisoning by arsenic and inorganic mercury salts. Treatment should be initiated as rapidly as possible (within minutes to a few hours), as efficacy declines or disappears as the time interval between metal exposure and onset of chelation increases. DMPS and DMSA, which have a higher therapeutic index than BAL and do not redistribute arsenic or mercury to the brain, offer advantages in clinical practice. Although chelation following chronic exposure to inorganic arsenic and inorganic mercury may accelerate metal excretion and diminish metal burden in some organs, potential therapeutic efficacy in terms of decreased morbidity and mortality is largely unestablished in cases of chronic metal intoxication.

Indexed as

Chelation TherapyAnimalsArsenicalsArsenic PoisoningChelating AgentsHumansMercury PoisoningSuccimerTreatment OutcomeUnithiolArsenicalsChelating AgentslewisiteSuccimerUnithiol

Identifiers

PMID24178900
PMCPMC3846971
OpenAlexW1989616149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.