ArticleSurgical endoscopy2014
Transanal endoscopic surgery using a single access port: a practical tool in the surgeon's toybox.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Should the rectal defect be closed following transanal local excision of rectal tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2017Pooled it
- A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013.Techniques in coloproctology · 2014Pooled it
- Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Lesions.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsTrial
- Article
- Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2021Review
- Impact of tumor location on lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2016Article
- Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: State of the Art.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedGorgun, I Emre [corrected to Gorgun, I E]
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLarge polyps and early carcinomas of the rectum may be excised with transanal endoscopic surgery (TES). Single-port techniques are emerging in the field of colorectal surgery and have been adapted to many colorectal procedures so far. In this article, we aimed to present our initial experience with TES using a single access port with its technical details. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients undergoing TES using a single access port between July 2010 and January 2013 were included in the study. Patient demographics, operative technique, and both operative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated and presented.
resultsA total of 12 patients (ten males) were included in our study. The median age was 63.5 years (50-84), median American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 3 (2-4), and median body mass index was 28.8 kg/m(2) (17.4-55.6). Median operating time was 79 min (43-261). Histopathological diagnoses were as follows: tubulovillous adenoma (n = 6), tubular adenoma (n = 4), adenocarcinoma (n = 1), and neuroendocrine tumor (n = 1). Five patients were sent home on the day of surgery and the median postoperative hospital stay was 1 day (0-38). Median estimated blood loss was 22.5 ml (5-150). A transient urinary retention was developed in one patient postoperatively, and two patients had postoperative bleeding. The first of these patients with a long history of anticoagulant usage had rectal bleeding 13 days after surgery, which was successfully managed with medical treatment. The second patient was morbidly obese, had multiple comorbidities, and had rectal bleeding on postoperative day 7 which was managed with local epinephrine injection. He suffered unrelated cardiac death on postoperative day 38.
conclusionsTES is safe and feasible when using a single port and in the standard laparoscopic setting. The single-port technique may play a major role in the widespread utilization of TES as a treatment for large adenomas and early rectal cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.