SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2014
Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.
Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closed suction drainage has no benefits in revision total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.International orthopaedics · 2016Trial
- Article
- Isolated Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting for the Management of Periacetabular Osteolysis in Well-Fixed Cups with an Intact Locking Mechanism at Short-Term to Medium-Term Follow-Up: A Systematic Review.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2024Review
- Article
- Extended Fixation for Paprosky Type III Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Trabecular titanium cups in acetabular revision arthroplasty: analysis of 10-year survivorship, restoration of center of rotation and osteointegration.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- Role of Hip Arthroscopy in the Treatment of Avascular Necrosis of the Hip: A Systematic Review.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2022Review
- Tantalum Versus Titanium Acetabular Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Current Concept and a Review of the Current Literature.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2022Review
- Reconstruction of Paprosky Type III Acetabular Defects by Three-Dimensional Printed Porous Augment: Techniques and Clinical Outcomes of 18 Consecutive Cases.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Article
- The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2022Review
- Osseointegration of retrieved 3D-printed, off-the-shelf acetabular implants.Bone & joint research · 2021Article
- Porous silicon carbide coated with tantalum as potential material for bone implants.Regenerative biomaterials · 2020Article
- Evaluation of the bone morphology around four types of porous metal implants placed in distal femur of ovariectomized rats.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
- Characterization of dimensional, morphological and morphometric features of retrieved 3D-printed acetabular cups for hip arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
- Comparison of the Primary Stability of Porous Tantalum and Titanium Acetabular Revision Constructs.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Three-dimensional-printing Technology in Hip and Pelvic Surgery: Current Landscape.Hip & pelvis · 2020Review
- Effect of porous tantalum on promoting the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cellsJournal of orthopaedic translation · 2019Article
- Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed for Coxarthrosis Preserves Long-Term Physical Function: A 40-Year Experience.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2019Article
- A single centre study of 41 cases on the use of porous tantalum metal implants in acetabular revision surgery.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Article
- Acetabular Defect Reconstruction with Trabecular Metal Augments: Study with Minimum One-year Follow-up.Hip & pelvis · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature and report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of highly-porous acetabular cups in revision settings.
methodA literature search of four electronic databases of EMBASE, CINAHL-plus, PubMed, and SCOPUS yielded 25 studies reporting the outcomes of 2,083 revision procedures with highly-porous acetabular components. There was lack of high quality evidence (level I and level II studies) and only two studies with level III evidence, while the remainder were all level IV studies. In addition, a majority of the studies had small sample sizes and had short to mid-term follow-up. The mean age of the patients was 65 years (range, 58-72 years) and the mean follow-up was 3.6 years (range, two to six years). Outcomes evaluated were aseptic survivorship, Harris hip scores, migration rates, incidence of peri-acetabular radiolucencies and radiographic restoration of the hip centre.
resultsThe mean aseptic survivorship was 97.2% (range, 80-100%). The Harris hip scores improved from a mean pre-operative score of 42 points, (range, 29-75 points), to a mean postoperative score of 79 points (range, 69-94 points). The mean incidence of cup migration and prevalence of peri-acetabular radiolucencies was 2.4% (range, 0-8.8%) and 4.6% (range, 0-19%), respectively, at final follow-up. The vertical hip centre-of-rotation was restored significantly from a mean of 39.2 mm (range, 27.6-50 mm) pre-operatively, to a mean of 24.1 mm (range, 7.4-47 mm), postoperatively.
conclusionThe short-term clinical and radiographic results of highly-porous metals in revision hip arthroplasty are excellent with a low rate of loosening in the presence of both major and minor bone loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.